The Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It was intended to be used in the Santa Rosa platform due to the 800 MHz FSB. The T9550 is only slightly higher clocked but offers already a FSB1066.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9500 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9500 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 is an entry level laptop processor based on the Penryn core. It offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6600, the T6670 offers Virtualization VT-x and a higher maximum temperature of 105°C.
The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is limited.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 → 100%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 → 77%n=9
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 → 68%n=9
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 25. 08:52:44
#0 checking url part for id 376 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 424 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:08:30 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 376 +0.002s ... 0.032s
#8 got single benchmarks 376 +0.024s ... 0.056s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0.002s ... 0.058s
#10 got single benchmarks 467 +0.016s ... 0.074s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 424 +0.002s ... 0.076s
#12 got single benchmarks 424 +0.036s ... 0.112s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.093s ... 0.205s