Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5900Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800667
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt
65 nm65 nm1.0375V-1.300V
SocketSocket PPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
$286 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7200

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (19%)     max: 2130 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (5%)     max: 4100 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (4%)     max: 1757 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
26 s (6%)
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
65 s (3%)
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
18700 MIPS (9%)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7200 +
2091 Points (86%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7200 +
2018 Points (91%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4639 Points (29%)
min: 2864     avg: 4013     median: 4002 (25%)     max: 5006 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 93% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 03:56:47

#0 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 got single benchmarks 439 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.015s

#44 got single benchmarks 168 +0.037s ... 0.052s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.054s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#101 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.061s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.033s ... 0.094s

#103 return log +0.004s ... 0.098s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)