, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops based on the old Merom core. It offers only an FSB of 667 MHz and 2 MB level 2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
MeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
2100 MHz2000 MHz
667667
2 MB4 MB
2 / 22 / 2
34 34
65 65 1.0375V-1.300V
Architecturex86x86
291
143 mm2
100 °C
PBGA479, PPGA478
Virtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$286 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5850 +
2161 (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5850 +
3997 (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1768 Points (10%)
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (9%)     max: 1757 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 s (6%)
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
66 s (3%)
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1518 s (7%)
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
19664 MIPS (9%)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13902 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7200 +
2091 (86%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7200 +
2018 (91%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4516 Points (28%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5850 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 95% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 24. 11:11:01

#0 checking url part for id 440 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 440 +0s ... 0.005s

#7 got single benchmarks 440 +0.007s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 168 +0.038s ... 0.051s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.059s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)