Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 vs Apple M2

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 8cx Gen 3

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 Compute Platform is an ARM based SoC for Windows laptops. It integrates four big ARM Cortex-X1 performance cores (up to 3 GHz) and four smaller ARM Cortex-A78 with up to 2.4 GHz.

The Compute Platform also integrates a Snapdragon X62 5G modem with up to 10 Gbps download and 316 Mbps upload. The integrated WLAN modem supports Wi-Fi 6E (2x2) and the satellite positioning system supports BeiDou, Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, and SBAS. The integrated video engine supports H.264, H.265, and VP9 decoding in 4K 120fps.

The performance should be around 85% faster for the CPU and 60% faster for the GPU compared to the previous generation (Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2).

The chip is produced in the modern 5nm process at Samsung (5LPE) and designed for fanless laptops (7 to 9 Watt TDP range).

Apple M2

► remove from comparison Apple M2

The Apple M2 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2022 MacBook Air and, MacBook Pro 13. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 16 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with  up to 2,4 GHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with up to 3,5 GHz and therefore higher than the M1 cores. The architecture should be similar to the A15 (iPhone 13) with Avalanche and Blizzard cores.

The chip features a unified memory architecture for the CPU and GPU cores and supports up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 for a bandwidth of up to 100GB/s.

According to Apple, the M2 offers a 18% higher CPU performance at the same power consumption level compared to the Apple M1. In our tests, the MacBook Pro 13 with active cooling was able to reach the 18% in Geekbench Multi. In other benchmarks we measured 12 to 15% gains compared to the M1. Therefore, the performance is now near the M1 Pro with 8 cores. The passively cooled MacBook Air may however suffer from throttling in longer load scenarios.

The integrated graphics card in the M2 offers 8 or 10 cores and a peak performance of 3.6 TFLOPs.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 16 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M2 includes 20 billion transistors (up from the 16 billion of the M1) and is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is rated at 20W what we also measured under CPU load.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3Apple M2
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonApple Apple M2
CodenameCortex-X1 / A78
Clock2400 - 2995 MHz2424 - 3480 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB2 MB
L2 Cache6 MB20 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
TDP7 Watt20 Watt
Technology5 nm5 nm
FeaturesFastConnect 6900 2x2 Wi-Fi, Adreno 690 GPUARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 690Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.apple.com
Series: Apple M2
Apple M2 Max compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro compare2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 « 2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Transistors20000 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD 8cx Gen 3
24.4 pt (34%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
121 Points (84%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
513 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3534     avg: 3603     median: 3567 (3%)     max: 3709 Points
243%
M2 +
min: 8517     avg: 8654     median: 8667 (8%)     max: 8772 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 559     avg: 588     median: 598 (25%)     max: 608 Points
265%
M2 +
min: 1580     avg: 1595     median: 1585 (67%)     max: 1638 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 199     avg: 208.7     median: 205 (23%)     max: 222 Points
186%
M2 +
min: 216     avg: 370.8     median: 381 (42%)     max: 446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 810     avg: 1105     median: 1248 (3%)     max: 1258 Points
186%
M2 +
min: 2231     avg: 2325     median: 2324 (6%)     max: 2416 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 723     avg: 749     median: 748.5 (5%)     max: 774 Points
162%
M2 +
min: 1209.9     avg: 1222     median: 1215 (8%)     max: 1243 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 119     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (36%)     max: 119.1 Points
187%
M2 +
min: 222     avg: 223.8     median: 223 (67%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.2 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2481 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
13940 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
305.3 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4046 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 16223     avg: 21572     median: 23989 (14%)     max: 24505 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3874     avg: 3912     median: 3915 (47%)     max: 3946 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
33.2 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
146.9 fps (34%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.5     avg: 2.2     median: 2.5 (4%)     max: 2.68 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1153     avg: 1626     median: 1625.5 (21%)     max: 2098 Seconds
116%
M2 +
min: 540     avg: 620     median: 619.5 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1059     avg: 1246     median: 1080 (8%)     max: 1600 Seconds
104%
M2 +
min: 549     avg: 614     median: 597 (4%)     max: 713 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.011     avg: 1     median: 1 (22%)     max: 1.013 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3876 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
37.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
848 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7084     avg: 7306     median: 7333 (20%)     max: 7500 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18857 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2899     avg: 4704     median: 4704 (12%)     max: 6509 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9533     avg: 9637     median: 9637 (17%)     max: 9741 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2939 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2593     avg: 2622     median: 2621.5 (80%)     max: 2650 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 10034     avg: 10064     median: 10063.5 (40%)     max: 10093 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1486     avg: 1588     median: 1588 (67%)     max: 1690 Points
121%
M2 +
min: 1890     avg: 1918     median: 1917 (81%)     max: 1953 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4457     avg: 5990     median: 5989.5 (11%)     max: 7522 Points
150%
M2 +
min: 8491     avg: 8839     median: 8961 (16%)     max: 8994 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 663     avg: 665     median: 665 (3%)     max: 667 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3749     avg: 3797     median: 3796.5 (12%)     max: 3844 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3460 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15240 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1913     avg: 1925     median: 1915 (2%)     max: 1946 ms
102%
M2 +
min: 440     avg: 452.4     median: 450.9 (1%)     max: 466.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
49893 Points (45%)
150%
M2 +
min: 72484     avg: 74097     median: 74614 (67%)     max: 75776 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 64.2     avg: 66.2     median: 67.2 (19%)     max: 67.2 Points
337%
M2 +
min: 223     avg: 235.5     median: 226.5 (65%)     max: 256 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 84.7     avg: 90.5     median: 90.5 (19%)     max: 96.2 Points
417%
M2 +
min: 342     avg: 369.1     median: 377 (79%)     max: 387 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1257990     avg: 1337360     median: 1337360 (81%)     max: 1416730 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 294643     avg: 298254     median: 298254 (82%)     max: 301865 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 627     avg: 673     median: 672.5 (26%)     max: 718 Points
226%
M2 +
min: 1496     avg: 1533     median: 1520 (58%)     max: 1585 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 26.9     avg: 33.5     median: 35.7 (6%)     max: 37.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.7     avg: 33     median: 33 (6%)     max: 33.2 Watt
101%
1 M2 +
29 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 9.08     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (4%)     max: 9.71 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.21     avg: 3.4     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.6 Watt
101%
1 M2 +
min: 2.03     avg: 2.6     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 3.98 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.5     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (4%)     max: 3.9 Watt
99%
1 M2 +
min: 2.32     avg: 4.1     median: 4.7 (5%)     max: 5.32 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 22.1     avg: 22.7     median: 22.7 (17%)     max: 23.3 Points per Watt
187%
1 M2 +
42.4 Points per Watt (32%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 → 197% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 00:31:34

#0 checking url part for id 14600 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14521 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.052s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14600 +0.017s ... 0.069s

#7 got single benchmarks 14600 +0.012s ... 0.081s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14521 +0.003s ... 0.084s

#9 got single benchmarks 14521 +0.017s ... 0.1s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.22s ... 0.32s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.348s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)