Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 865

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2019. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 2.84 GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A77 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. The difference to the older Snapdragon 855 is the switch from Cortex-A76 to the faster Cortex-A77 architecture. The clock speeds stay the same. 

Therefore, the Snapdragon 865 takes the top spot in mobile processors for Android based systems. In some multi-core workloads, the SD865 can even perform on par with the Apple A13 SoC. Single thread, however is still a strong suit of the Apple SoCs.

Compared to the previous generations, the Snapdragon 865 does not integrate an LTE modem anymore, but has to be paired with the new X55 5G modem, that also supports LTE Cat 24/22. The Wi-Fi module however is still integrated and called FastConnect 6800 with support for Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and 8x8 MU-MIMU and 60 GHz 802.11ay with up to 10 Gbps. Bluetooth 5.1 is also supported including aptX Adaptive.

The integrated GPU is now called Adreno 650 and should offer 20% more performance than the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 855.

The on board Hexagon 698 DSP now offers an improved KI performance of up to 15 TOPS (up from 7 TOPS in the 855) and still uses a combination of CPU, GPU, HVX and Tensor cores. The Spectra 480 ISP is now also significantly faster. The integrated Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) now supports Dolby Vision, 8K videos and 200 megapixel photos.

The built-in memory controller now supports LPDDR5 with up to 2,750 MHz and LPDDR4X with 2,133 MHz.

The Snapdragon 865 is manufactured at TSMC in the new improved 7nm process (N7P, DUV-based). The process offers a 7% higher performance or 10% less power consumption compared to the old N7 process.

HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G

The HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 30 Pro in late 2019. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.86 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 2.36 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.95 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a neural processor (2 + 1 cores) for AI tasks and a ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GPU clocked at up to 700 MHz. Compared to the 4G version, the 5G Kirin 990 integrates a Balong 5G modem and is slightly higher clocked (2 of the 3 clusters and the GPU).

The Kirin 990 5G is produced in the modern 7nm (7FF+ with EUV) process at TSMC, the 4G version is still produced in the slightly older 7nm process as the Kirin 980.

HiSilicon Kirin 820

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 820

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to 2.36 GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to 2.22 (as the old Kirin 810) and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.88 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU.

The performance of the CPU part in our tests was slightly higher than the old Kirin 810 (thanks to the fast performance core). Huawei advertises 27% performance advantage for the CPU. The NPU and GPU have bigger performance gains with 73% and 38% more power.

The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 865HiSilicon Kirin 990 5GHiSilicon Kirin 820
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonHiSilicon HiSilicon
CodenameCortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)Cortex-A76/-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G2.42 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores7 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)2.42 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 « 2.42 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G « - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8101.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 « 1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8101.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock2420 - 2840 MHz <=2860 MHz1840 - 2360 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
TDP5 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm7 nm
FeaturesAdreno 650 GPU, Spectra 480 ISP, LPDDR5 2750 MHz / LPDDR4X 2133 MHz Memory ControllerARM Mali-G76MP16 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (2.36) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.95 GHz, big.LITTLE), Balong 5G ModemARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to 2.36 GHz, 3x A76 nup to 2.2 GHz, 4x A55 up to 1.84 GHz, big.LITTLE, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 650 (250 - 587 MHz)ARM Mali-G76 MP16 ( - 700 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP6
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Transistors10300 Million
Manufacturerwww.hisilicon.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 865
min: 1.186     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (91%)     max: 1.3 pt
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 990 5G
min: 1.102     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (85%)     max: 1.3 pt
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 820
0.9 pt (67%)
min: 22857     avg: 35317     median: 35840.5 (30%)     max: 46731 Points
41610 Points (35%)
min: 2497     avg: 4729     median: 5326 (63%)     max: 5766 Points
4642 Points (55%)
min: 4836     avg: 5318     median: 5358 (61%)     max: 5721 Points
4637 Points (53%)
min: 755     avg: 771     median: 772.5 (33%)     max: 783 Points
642 Points (27%)
min: 2972     avg: 3077     median: 3076.5 (6%)     max: 3183 Points
2434 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 865 +
932 Points (4%)
769 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 865 +
3450 Points (11%)
3083 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4261     avg: 4281     median: 4278 (43%)     max: 4304 Points
min: 3915     avg: 3925     median: 3925 (39%)     max: 3935 Points
3113 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13186     avg: 13396     median: 13356 (15%)     max: 13589 Points
min: 12324     avg: 12549     median: 12549 (14%)     max: 12774 Points
9860 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3984     avg: 3992     median: 3991.5 (54%)     max: 3999 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11812     avg: 12006     median: 12005.5 (29%)     max: 12199 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 3576     avg: 3816     median: 3918 (32%)     max: 3954 Points
min: 1615     avg: 2579     median: 2578.5 (21%)     max: 3542 Points
4235 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 4592     avg: 4779     median: 4742 (43%)     max: 5003 Points
min: 4881     avg: 5643     median: 5643 (51%)     max: 6405 Points
5223 Points (47%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 17346     avg: 18106     median: 18163 (36%)     max: 18810 Points
min: 19287     avg: 20143     median: 20143 (39%)     max: 20999 Points
17014 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 8818     avg: 9056     median: 9174 (18%)     max: 9175 Points
min: 9013     avg: 9236     median: 9235.5 (19%)     max: 9458 Points
7277 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 10610     avg: 10878     median: 10921 (29%)     max: 11104 Points
min: 11042     avg: 11669     median: 11668.5 (31%)     max: 12295 Points
9969 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 0     avg: 2031     median: 2032.5 (2%)     max: 2911 ms
min: 1914     avg: 2084     median: 2066.5 (2%)     max: 2287 ms
2254 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 865 +
312.5 ms (3%)
345.4 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 14606     avg: 22518     median: 23734 (21%)     max: 31224 Points
min: 20917     avg: 22323     median: 22343 (20%)     max: 23690 Points
19727 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 97     avg: 106.7     median: 104 (22%)     max: 127 Points
min: 95     avg: 105.7     median: 98 (20%)     max: 124 Points
115 Points (24%)
min: 67274     avg: 75033     median: 73056 (61%)     max: 86746 Points
68406 Points (57%)
min: 66292     avg: 98762     median: 103022 (83%)     max: 122714 Points
52226 Points (42%)
min: 159628     avg: 167229     median: 167842 (31%)     max: 173605 Points
117476 Points (22%)
min: 136344     avg: 145447     median: 145294 (53%)     max: 154856 Points
131099 Points (47%)
min: 450373     avg: 486472     median: 483829 (47%)     max: 527856 Points
369207 Points (36%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 628715     avg: 671674     median: 671674 (41%)     max: 714632 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 171838     avg: 178785     median: 178785 (49%)     max: 185732 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
238069 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 865 +
11610 Points (54%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 6478     avg: 8077     median: 6893 (36%)     max: 11637 Points
min: 5869     avg: 7653     median: 7653 (40%)     max: 9437 Points
8006 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 21645     avg: 24717     median: 24097 (51%)     max: 28841 Points
29206 Points (62%)
22692 Points (48%)
min: 8512     avg: 10025     median: 10038.5 (66%)     max: 11509 Points
9527 Points (62%)
min: 10628     avg: 12766     median: 12810 (64%)     max: 14814 Points
13099 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 865 +
4.4 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 865 +
2.3 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G → 97% n=24

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820 → 87% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 07. 00:55:40

#0 checking url part for id 11551 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11508 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12581 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.096s ... 0.097s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.097s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11551 +0.012s ... 0.109s

#8 got single benchmarks 11551 +0.049s ... 0.158s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11508 +0.01s ... 0.168s

#10 got single benchmarks 11508 +0.017s ... 0.185s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12581 +0.01s ... 0.195s

#12 got single benchmarks 12581 +0.009s ... 0.205s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.205s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.103s ... 0.308s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.309s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.311s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.313s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.316s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.317s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.319s

#21 min, max, avg, median took s +0.113s ... 0.432s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.432s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)