Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Samsung Exynos 9820

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 865

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2019. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 2.84 GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A77 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. The difference to the older Snapdragon 855 is the switch from Cortex-A76 to the faster Cortex-A77 architecture. The clock speeds stay the same. 

Therefore, the Snapdragon 865 takes the top spot in mobile processors for Android based systems. In some multi-core workloads, the SD865 can even perform on par with the Apple A13 SoC. Single thread, however is still a strong suit of the Apple SoCs.

Compared to the previous generations, the Snapdragon 865 does not integrate an LTE modem anymore, but has to be paired with the new X55 5G modem, that also supports LTE Cat 24/22. The Wi-Fi module however is still integrated and called FastConnect 6800 with support for Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and 8x8 MU-MIMU and 60 GHz 802.11ay with up to 10 Gbps. Bluetooth 5.1 is also supported including aptX Adaptive.

The integrated GPU is now called Adreno 650 and should offer 20% more performance than the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 855.

The on board Hexagon 698 DSP now offers an improved KI performance of up to 15 TOPS (up from 7 TOPS in the 855) and still uses a combination of CPU, GPU, HVX and Tensor cores. The Spectra 480 ISP is now also significantly faster. The integrated Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) now supports Dolby Vision, 8K videos and 200 megapixel photos.

The built-in memory controller now supports LPDDR5 with up to 2,750 MHz and LPDDR4X with 2,133 MHz.

The Snapdragon 865 is manufactured at TSMC in the new improved 7nm process (N7P, DUV-based). The process offers a 7% higher performance or 10% less power consumption compared to the old N7 process.

Samsung Exynos 9820

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9820

The Samsung Exynos 9 9820 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2018 and was first integrated in the Samsung Galaxy S10 smartphones early 2019. The SoC integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.7 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.3 GHz. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. The single core performance is, thanks to the big custom cores, a strong suit of the CPU and reaches the levels of Apples mobile SoCs. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The predecessor Exynos 9810 can be bested by around 17% in our first benchmarks with the Galaxy S10 Plus.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 8nm LPP process that should also help with some of the performance gains.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 865Samsung Exynos 9820
CodenameCortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung Exynos
Series: Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G compare2.42 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores7 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) compare2.42 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 « 2.42 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Samsung Exynos 9825 compare1.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9820 « 1.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 compare - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Clock2420 - 2840 MHz1900 - 2700 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
TDP5 Watt
Technology7 nm8 nm
FeaturesAdreno 650 GPU, Spectra 480 ISP, LPDDR5 2750 MHz / LPDDR4X 2133 MHz Memory ControllerARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 650 (250 - 587 MHz)ARM Mali-G76 MP12
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 865
min: 1.186     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (91%)     max: 1.3 pt
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9820
0.8 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
min: 31297     avg: 32016     median: 32228.5 (26%)     max: 32308 Points
min: 2925     avg: 3123     median: 3043.5 (29%)     max: 3480 Points
min: 3077     avg: 3226     median: 3087 (35%)     max: 3513 Points
825 Points (31%)
2259 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
932 Points (4%)
836 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3450 Points (11%)
2306 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4261     avg: 4281     median: 4278 (43%)     max: 4304 Points
min: 4499     avg: 4510     median: 4505.5 (45%)     max: 4529 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13186     avg: 13396     median: 13356 (13%)     max: 13589 Points
min: 10162     avg: 10366     median: 10374 (10%)     max: 10553 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4881     avg: 4958     median: 4957.5 (55%)     max: 5034 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10000     avg: 10109     median: 10109 (13%)     max: 10218 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
min: 2382     avg: 2388     median: 2387.5 (36%)     max: 2393 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7690     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (12%)     max: 7957 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 3576     avg: 3816     median: 3918 (21%)     max: 3954 Points
min: 1870     avg: 1985     median: 1984.5 (11%)     max: 2099 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 4592     avg: 4779     median: 4742 (33%)     max: 5003 Points
min: 2997     avg: 3050     median: 3049.5 (21%)     max: 3102 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 17346     avg: 18106     median: 18163 (36%)     max: 18810 Points
min: 14240     avg: 14552     median: 14552 (29%)     max: 14864 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 8818     avg: 9056     median: 9174 (18%)     max: 9175 Points
min: 7271     avg: 7404     median: 7403.5 (15%)     max: 7536 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 10610     avg: 10878     median: 10921 (29%)     max: 11104 Points
min: 8338     avg: 8493     median: 8492.5 (22%)     max: 8647 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 0     avg: 2031     median: 2032.5 (2%)     max: 2911 ms
min: 1823     avg: 1961     median: 1890.5 (2%)     max: 2240 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 865 +
312.5 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 14606     avg: 22518     median: 23734 (17%)     max: 31224 Points
min: 18697     avg: 20121     median: 20469.5 (15%)     max: 20849 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 97     avg: 106.7     median: 104 (19%)     max: 127 Points
115 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
99150 Points (100%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 269219     avg: 275038     median: 273831 (93%)     max: 283270 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 12202     avg: 12486     median: 12323.5 (38%)     max: 13096 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 67209     avg: 68326     median: 68203 (84%)     max: 69689 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 148074     avg: 148912     median: 149162 (46%)     max: 149249 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 97864     avg: 99848     median: 99722 (61%)     max: 102082 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 327454     avg: 329572     median: 328778 (58%)     max: 333277 Points
64371 Points (54%)
71200 Points (57%)
166540 Points (31%)
128208 Points (46%)
430319 Points (41%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 628715     avg: 671674     median: 671674 (33%)     max: 714632 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 171838     avg: 178785     median: 178785 (45%)     max: 185732 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 865 +
11610 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 6478     avg: 8077     median: 6893 (36%)     max: 11637 Points
min: 5013     avg: 5063     median: 5075 (27%)     max: 5101 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 21645     avg: 24717     median: 24097 (51%)     max: 28841 Points
min: 8407     avg: 8786     median: 8830 (19%)     max: 9121 Points
min: 7595     avg: 7769     median: 7758 (51%)     max: 7966 Points
min: 9557     avg: 9777     median: 9771.5 (49%)     max: 10008 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 865 +
4.4 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 865 +
2.3 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9820 → 77% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 11. 13:05:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11551 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11322 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760180716s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11551 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 11551 +0.019s ... 0.027s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11322 +0.003s ... 0.03s

#10 got single benchmarks 11322 +0.005s ... 0.035s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.045s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.063s

#14 return log +0s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)