Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Mediatek MT8788

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Mediatek MT8788

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio MT8788

The Mediatek MT8788 is an upper mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in early 2018. It is manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET (12FFC) process and is equipped with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE). The cores can reach a frequency of up to 2 GHz. The processor also integrates a ARM Mali-G72MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit. Furthermore, the integrated radio Wifi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.2, and FM radio. The specifications of the MT8788 are identical to the Helio P60 for Smartphones.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 662Mediatek MT8788
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonMediatek Mediatek
CodenameKryo 260Cortex-A73 / A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A73 / A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Mediatek Helio P70 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek Helio P60T compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek Helio P60 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek MT8788 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology11 nm12 nm
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP4x ARM Cortex-A73, 4x ARM Cortex-A53,
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G72 MP3 (800 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1588     avg: 2240     median: 2272 (27%)     max: 2534 Points
min: 2583     avg: 2605     median: 2604.5 (31%)     max: 2626 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 2146     avg: 2330     median: 2384 (27%)     max: 2502 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (9%)     max: 333 Points
329 Points (9%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
1284 Points (5%)
min: 283     avg: 291     median: 291 (12%)     max: 299 Points
min: 1382     avg: 1383     median: 1383 (2%)     max: 1384 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1472 Points (15%)
971 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4938 Points (5%)
4983 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
3874 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
min: 10032     avg: 10153     median: 10152.5 (9%)     max: 10273 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
0 Points (0%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 26857     avg: 35819     median: 37388 (31%)     max: 38718 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 32579     avg: 37486     median: 34946 (28%)     max: 46499 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 25724     avg: 33052     median: 33402 (6%)     max: 43315 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 68508     avg: 70945     median: 71065 (26%)     max: 72576 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
213255 Points (13%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
59558 Points (16%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 662 +
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
8211 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
min: 6445     avg: 6836     median: 6835.5 (32%)     max: 7226 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 5866     avg: 6258     median: 6139 (40%)     max: 7184 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 7247     avg: 7986     median: 8000.5 (40%)     max: 8714 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
328 Points (13%)
0 Points (0%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
4.3 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt
2.3 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8788 → 86% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 01:22:15

#0 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14628 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.018s ... 0.037s

#7 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.039s ... 0.076s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14628 +0.004s ... 0.08s

#9 got single benchmarks 14628 +0.012s ... 0.092s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.091s ... 0.183s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.189s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.058s ... 0.247s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.259s

#15 return log +0.073s ... 0.332s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)