Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes with 16 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.1 GHz, the 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support and a whole lot of L3 cache.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max+ chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

From leaks, we know that the Ryzen delivers around 20,700 Geekbench 6.3 Multi points, meaning it trades blow with very powerful desktop CPUs like the Ryzen 9 9900X.

Graphics

The Radeon 8060S is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer, as of Jan 2025. It features 40 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2560 unified shaders) that could see it outcompeting lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the GeForce RTX 4050. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max+ 395 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285HX

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is a mobile high-end CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 24 cores consisting of 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.5 GHz and 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.6 GHz clock speed. The CPU has access to 40 MB L2 cache and 36 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with four Xe cores running at 300 - 2000 MHz.

Performance - High End

The performance of the Ultra 9 285HX should be slightly below the similar Desktop Core Ultra 9 285K (higher clocked with up to 5.7 GHz and more TDP with 125 watts). Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should outperform the old Raptor Lake Core i9-14900HX (8 + 16 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes equipped with 8 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.0 GHz, the 32 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8050S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Architecture and Features

Unlike it is with Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads. The CPU's L3 cache is fairly large at 32 MB. That being said, the higher-end 390 and 395 AI Max chips have twice the amount.

Performance

Its CPU performance should be about as good as the fastest Qualcomm Snapdragon X chips, like the X1E-84-100.

Graphics

The Radeon 8050S sports 32 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2048 unified shaders) that could see it competing with entry-level and mid-range desktop graphics cards like the Radeon RX 7700 XT. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max 385 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Intel Core Ultra 9 285HXAMD Ryzen AI Max 385
CodenameStrix HaloArrow Lake-HXStrix Halo
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)Intel Arrow LakeAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 3903.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 3853.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX « 2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 3953 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 3903.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 « 3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Clock3000 - 5100 MHz2100 - 5500 MHz3600 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache16 MB40 MB8 MB
L3 Cache64 MB36 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
24 / 24
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 16
8 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP55 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
Technology4 nm3 nm4 nm
SocketFP11FP11
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (300 - 2000 MHz)AMD Radeon 8050S ( - 2800 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT813 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI126 TOPS INT8106 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI Max+ 395
46.9 pt (78%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285HX
47.9 pt (80%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 114     avg: 115.4     median: 116 (58%)     max: 116.8 Points
min: 126.3     avg: 130.3     median: 130.3 (65%)     max: 134.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1648     avg: 1805     median: 1827 (34%)     max: 1912 Points
min: 1907     avg: 2103     median: 2102.5 (39%)     max: 2298 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 29063     avg: 34856     median: 35991 (33%)     max: 37423 Points
min: 35165     avg: 37641     median: 37641 (35%)     max: 40117 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2034     avg: 2045     median: 2044 (83%)     max: 2052 Points
min: 2057     avg: 2121     median: 2121 (86%)     max: 2185 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 791     avg: 799     median: 800 (87%)     max: 803 Points
min: 799     avg: 820     median: 820 (89%)     max: 841 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 11357     avg: 13533     median: 13882 (34%)     max: 14641 Points
min: 13758     avg: 14755     median: 14754.5 (36%)     max: 15751 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4739     avg: 5371     median: 5488 (35%)     max: 5881 Points
min: 5427     avg: 5830     median: 5829.5 (37%)     max: 6232 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 314     avg: 316.4     median: 317 (88%)     max: 318 Points
min: 307     avg: 315.5     median: 315.5 (87%)     max: 324 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 55.9     avg: 63.2     median: 64.3 (83%)     max: 68.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.72     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (89%)     max: 3.77 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8691     avg: 8704     median: 8698 (53%)     max: 8728 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 62519     avg: 66954     median: 65332 (47%)     max: 74633 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 110924     avg: 123266     median: 114175 (73%)     max: 144699 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16057     avg: 16159     median: 16196 (20%)     max: 16223 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 32.773     avg: 111.5     median: 33.1 (0%)     max: 347.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.361     avg: 3.7     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 7.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3413     avg: 14883     median: 8853.5 (14%)     max: 38410 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 116237     avg: 123900     median: 121368 (70%)     max: 136872 MIPS
min: 106470     avg: 117624     median: 117624 (68%)     max: 128778 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6474     avg: 6501     median: 6499 (77%)     max: 6540 MIPS
min: 6665     avg: 6744     median: 6743.5 (79%)     max: 6822 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 188.8     avg: 204.4     median: 189.4 (5%)     max: 235 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 320.5     avg: 324.5     median: 325.5 (8%)     max: 327.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 32.4     avg: 35.1     median: 33.7 (59%)     max: 40.3 fps
min: 36.5     avg: 40.4     median: 40.4 (71%)     max: 44.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.7     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (66%)     max: 3.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 5.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 16.7     avg: 21.5     median: 20.2 (53%)     max: 28.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 132     avg: 140.6     median: 134 (2%)     max: 163 Seconds
min: 132     avg: 147     median: 147 (2%)     max: 162 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 86     avg: 91.6     median: 87 (1%)     max: 107 Seconds
min: 83     avg: 90.5     median: 90.5 (1%)     max: 98 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3984     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4094 sec
min: 0.4012     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4298 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16575     avg: 17918     median: 17702.5 (38%)     max: 19691 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.2     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 8.359 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.502     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.659 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
407.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 88295     avg: 91621     median: 91177 (70%)     max: 95834 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 22033     avg: 25525     median: 26998 (66%)     max: 28889 Points
min: 20813     avg: 25013     median: 25013 (62%)     max: 29213 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75830     avg: 79255     median: 77087 (63%)     max: 84504 Points
108978 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 75621     avg: 78854     median: 77354 (63%)     max: 83969 Points
109217 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 76968     avg: 79446     median: 79260.5 (64%)     max: 82293 Points
112055 Points (90%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 21608     avg: 23690     median: 23927.5 (61%)     max: 25765 Points
min: 25440     avg: 27286     median: 27285.5 (69%)     max: 29131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30555     avg: 35481     median: 37386 (67%)     max: 39630 Points
min: 47030     avg: 49342     median: 49341.5 (88%)     max: 51653 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9451     avg: 10534     median: 10837 (46%)     max: 11285 Points
min: 16247     avg: 17008     median: 17008 (72%)     max: 17769 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2791     avg: 2909     median: 2929 (68%)     max: 2978 Points
min: 2907     avg: 2998     median: 2997.5 (69%)     max: 3088 Points
2945 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 16510     avg: 19000     median: 17599 (68%)     max: 22157 Points
min: 20630     avg: 21367     median: 21367 (83%)     max: 22104 Points
16318 Points (63%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2819     avg: 2820     median: 2819.5 (90%)     max: 2820 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 16420     avg: 16428     median: 16428 (67%)     max: 16436 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2184     avg: 2224     median: 2228 (75%)     max: 2275 Points
min: 2121     avg: 2177     median: 2176.5 (73%)     max: 2232 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16535     avg: 19467     median: 17552 (31%)     max: 24593 Points
min: 24910     avg: 25960     median: 25960 (47%)     max: 27010 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1991     avg: 2060     median: 2091 (9%)     max: 2097 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16628     avg: 19726     median: 17929 (57%)     max: 24621 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8054     avg: 8190     median: 8220 (82%)     max: 8295 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 66187     avg: 78352     median: 66840 (66%)     max: 102029 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 424     avg: 431.8     median: 427 (0%)     max: 453 ms
min: 408     avg: 421.5     median: 421.5 (0%)     max: 435 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
123023 Points (81%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 252     avg: 274.2     median: 273 (71%)     max: 317 Points
min: 311     avg: 313.5     median: 313.5 (82%)     max: 316 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 325.2     median: 320 (57%)     max: 358 Points
min: 327     avg: 344.5     median: 344.5 (62%)     max: 362 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1948     avg: 2089     median: 2069 (77%)     max: 2274 Points
min: 2208     avg: 2216     median: 2215.5 (83%)     max: 2223 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 111.2     avg: 157.5     median: 169.9 (29%)     max: 184.7 Watt
min: 168.7     avg: 218.4     median: 218.4 (38%)     max: 268 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 133.2     avg: 177     median: 192.8 (35%)     max: 200 Watt
min: 245     avg: 267     median: 267 (49%)     max: 289 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.18     avg: 9.9     median: 10.5 (7%)     max: 11.5 Watt
min: 30.7     avg: 33.3     median: 33.3 (22%)     max: 35.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
13.8 Watt (17%)
34.3 Watt (41%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 27.9     avg: 31.4     median: 29.7 (22%)     max: 36.3 Points per Watt
min: 21.6     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (16%)     max: 22.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX → 112% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 → 97% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 22. 23:26:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18628 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18884 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18626 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761168398s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Oct 2025 05:18:45 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18628 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#9 got single benchmarks 18628 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18884 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#11 got single benchmarks 18884 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18626 +0s ... 0.008s

#13 got single benchmarks 18626 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.035s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.035s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)