Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285HX

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is a mobile high-end CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 24 cores consisting of 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.5 GHz and 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.6 GHz clock speed. The CPU has access to 40 MB L2 cache and 36 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with four Xe cores running at 300 - 2000 MHz.

Performance - High End

The performance of the Ultra 9 285HX should be slightly below the similar Desktop Core Ultra 9 285K (higher clocked with up to 5.7 GHz and more TDP with 125 watts). Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should outperform the old Raptor Lake Core i9-14900HX (8 + 16 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes equipped with 8 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.0 GHz, the 32 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8050S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Architecture and Features

Unlike it is with Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads. The CPU's L3 cache is fairly large at 32 MB. That being said, the higher-end 390 and 395 AI Max chips have twice the amount.

Performance

Its CPU performance should be about as good as the fastest Qualcomm Snapdragon X chips, like the X1E-84-100.

Graphics

The Radeon 8050S sports 32 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2048 unified shaders) that could see it competing with entry-level and mid-range desktop graphics cards like the Radeon RX 7700 XT. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max 385 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 285HXAMD Ryzen AI Max 385
CodenameArrow Lake-HXStrix Halo
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX « 2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX compare2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX compare2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX compare2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compare3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 compare3.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 « 3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Clock2100 - 5500 MHz3600 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache40 MB8 MB
L3 Cache36 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 16
8 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt
Technology3 nm4 nm
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (300 - 2000 MHz)AMD Radeon 8050S ( - 2800 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
SocketFP11
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
Chip AI106 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285HX
47.9 pt (80%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 126.3     avg: 130.3     median: 130.3 (65%)     max: 134.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1907     avg: 2103     median: 2102.5 (39%)     max: 2298 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 35165     avg: 37641     median: 37641 (35%)     max: 40117 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2057     avg: 2121     median: 2121 (86%)     max: 2185 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 799     avg: 820     median: 820 (89%)     max: 841 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 13758     avg: 14755     median: 14754.5 (36%)     max: 15751 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5427     avg: 5830     median: 5829.5 (37%)     max: 6232 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 307     avg: 315.5     median: 315.5 (87%)     max: 324 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 106470     avg: 117624     median: 117624 (68%)     max: 128778 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6665     avg: 6744     median: 6743.5 (79%)     max: 6822 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 36.5     avg: 40.4     median: 40.4 (71%)     max: 44.3 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 132     avg: 147     median: 147 (2%)     max: 162 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 83     avg: 90.5     median: 90.5 (1%)     max: 98 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4012     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4298 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20813     avg: 25013     median: 25013 (62%)     max: 29213 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
108978 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
109217 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
112055 Points (90%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 25440     avg: 27286     median: 27285.5 (69%)     max: 29131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 47030     avg: 49342     median: 49341.5 (88%)     max: 51653 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 16247     avg: 17008     median: 17008 (72%)     max: 17769 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2907     avg: 2998     median: 2997.5 (69%)     max: 3088 Points
2945 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 20630     avg: 21367     median: 21367 (83%)     max: 22104 Points
16318 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2121     avg: 2177     median: 2176.5 (73%)     max: 2232 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24910     avg: 25960     median: 25960 (47%)     max: 27010 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 408     avg: 421.5     median: 421.5 (0%)     max: 435 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 311     avg: 313.5     median: 313.5 (82%)     max: 316 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 327     avg: 344.5     median: 344.5 (62%)     max: 362 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2208     avg: 2216     median: 2215.5 (83%)     max: 2223 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 168.7     avg: 218.4     median: 218.4 (38%)     max: 268 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 245     avg: 267     median: 267 (49%)     max: 289 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 30.7     avg: 33.3     median: 33.3 (22%)     max: 35.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
34.3 Watt (41%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 21.6     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (16%)     max: 22.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 → 87% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 23. 06:39:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18884 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18626 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761194358s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Oct 2025 05:18:45 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18884 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 18884 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18626 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 18626 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.033s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.037s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)