Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in October 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 INT8 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support. Unlike it is with the non-PRO AI 9 HX 370 chip, the AMD Secure Processor (an on-package ARM co-processor) is onboard, as well as a few other higher-end features such as AMD-Vi.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and the remaining 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. With a top clock speed of just 3.3 GHz, the latter are not just less complex but also run at significantly lower clock speeds.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors, such as the lack of PCIe 5 support.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 9 PRO chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 ECC and non-ECC RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The APU is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). Its PCIe controller is capped at 4.0 speeds which is 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like it was with the 8000 series predecessors. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU is a lot more complex than the first-gen XDNA was, and delivers up to 55 INT8 TOPS for various AI workloads such as Copilot.

As usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the HX PRO 370, we do have plenty of benchmark results for its non-PRO brother. The most important specs are identical between the two. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect HX PRO 370-toting systems to deliver multi-thread performance on par with laptops and mini-PCs powered by the Core i7-13650HX (Raptor Lake, 6 P-cores, 8 E-cores, 157 W short-term power target). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 and its non-Pro sibling are going to be very close nearby as well, since their only advantage over the two 370 chips is the slightly faster 55 TOPS NPU.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU on the market, as of Q4 2024. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs/WGPs; that's 1024 unified shaders that run at up to 2,900 MHz.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors simultaneously. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

As for its performance, the graphics adapter can be as slow as the Arc 8 or as fast as the RTX 2050 Laptop depending on the benchmark or game. On average, the 890M finds itself very close to the GTX 1650 Laptop making it possible to play 2024 AAA games at 1080p with most settings set to Low. Baldur's Gate 3 is playable on medium settings, as are several other 2023 games.

Power consumption

The 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W which they actually do to maximize performance. The highest we've seen as of October 2024 was 80 W.

Strix Point chips are a single-die design. The TSMC N4P process that they are built with allows for very decent, as of Q4 2024, power efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes with 16 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.1 GHz, the 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Unlike its non-PRO sibling, the chip features AMD Secure Processor (an on-package ARM security co-processor), Windows Device Guard and AMD-Vi. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support and a whole lot of L3 cache.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max+ PRO chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

From leaks, we know that the Ryzen delivers around 20,700 Geekbench 6.3 Multi points, meaning it trades blow with very powerful desktop CPUs like the Ryzen 9 9900X.

Graphics

The Radeon 8060S is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer, as of Jan 2025. It features 40 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2560 unified shaders) that could see it outcompeting lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the GeForce RTX 4050. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max+ PRO 395 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
CodenameStrix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c)Strix Halo PRO
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz3000 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB16 MB
L3 Cache24 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP28 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
SocketFP8FP11
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX+, SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo PRO
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compare3.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
38.1 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 pt (76%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 112.2     avg: 112.6     median: 112.6 (63%)     max: 113 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1643     avg: 1691     median: 1690.5 (31%)     max: 1738 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18520 Points (17%)
min: 30706     avg: 35061     median: 35061 (33%)     max: 39416 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1939 Points (82%)
min: 2003     avg: 2013     median: 2012.5 (85%)     max: 2022 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
757 Points (82%)
min: 783     avg: 787     median: 787 (86%)     max: 791 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6518 Points (16%)
min: 11816     avg: 13429     median: 13428.5 (33%)     max: 15041 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3082 Points (19%)
min: 4784     avg: 5247     median: 5247 (33%)     max: 5710 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
191.4 Points (53%)
min: 305     avg: 306     median: 306 (85%)     max: 307 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
62.9 Points (81%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (86%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8580 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60278 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
108876 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15953 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
31.8 s (0%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4649 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
74121 MIPS (43%)
min: 109760     avg: 117149     median: 117148 (67%)     max: 124537 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6054 MIPS (71%)
min: 5613     avg: 5998     median: 5998 (71%)     max: 6383 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
182.8 fps (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
316 fps (73%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
23.6 fps (41%)
min: 30.4     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (56%)     max: 33 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.6 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.5 GB/s (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.6 GB/s (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
267 Seconds (3%)
min: 132     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (2%)     max: 159 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
169 Seconds (1%)
min: 90     avg: 96     median: 96 (1%)     max: 102 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.4027     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4127 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16509 Points (35%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
23.9 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
89313 Points (69%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
19177 Points (47%)
min: 21268     avg: 23295     median: 23295 (57%)     max: 25322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77244 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79672 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 20971     avg: 21827     median: 21826.5 (55%)     max: 22682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27184 Points (48%)
min: 29555     avg: 31057     median: 31057 (55%)     max: 32559 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9897 Points (42%)
min: 9596     avg: 9831     median: 9831 (41%)     max: 10066 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2864     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (72%)     max: 2912 Points
min: 2756     avg: 2824     median: 2823.5 (71%)     max: 2891 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 14066     avg: 14403     median: 14402.5 (56%)     max: 14739 Points
min: 16503     avg: 16679     median: 16679 (65%)     max: 16855 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2115 Points (83%)
min: 2071     avg: 2141     median: 2141 (84%)     max: 2211 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14518 Points (26%)
min: 16565     avg: 17408     median: 17408 (31%)     max: 18251 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2072 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
16377 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8865 Points (89%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
65863 Points (66%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
443 ms (1%)
min: 428     avg: 430.5     median: 430.5 (1%)     max: 433 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
280 Points (77%)
min: 225     avg: 250     median: 250 (69%)     max: 275 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
331 Points (59%)
min: 275     avg: 304.5     median: 304.5 (55%)     max: 334 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1835 Points (69%)
min: 1892     avg: 1909     median: 1909 (71%)     max: 1926 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
55.7 Watt (10%)
min: 116.5     avg: 151.8     median: 151.8 (26%)     max: 187.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 115.3     avg: 170.7     median: 170.7 (31%)     max: 226 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (4%)
min: 7.45     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (6%)     max: 9.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7 Watt (8%)
7.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
25.3 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 → 128% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 19:38:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18015 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18881 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755452303s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18015 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 18015 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18881 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 18881 +0.007s ... 0.027s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.043s ... 0.07s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)