The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in October 2024. The hybrid architecture APU has 8 CPU cores onboard (a mix of three Zen 5 and five Zen 5c cores) running at 2.0 to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. The AMD Secure Processor (which in a nutshell is an on-package ARM co-processor) is onboard as well as are a few other higher-end features such as AMD-Vi. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and up to LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support, including ECC RAM.
Architecture and Features
Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.
Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.
Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.
As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI PRO chip is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.
Performance
We fully expect this PRO series processor to be 15% to 25% slower than the 10-core Ryzen AI 9 365 chip for Core Ultra 7 155U-like multi-thread benchmark scores. Of course, a lot depends on how high the power targets are which can differ vastly between designs.
Graphics
The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs several differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this AMD iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.
Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.
Power consumption
The 360 is supposed to have a low-term TDP power target of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.
The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.
The Ryzen AI 9 365 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The chip features 10 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support.
Of the 10 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores with the other 6 being smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former. In the meantime, the more expensive Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has both more CPU cores and a faster 16 CU integrated graphics adapter.
Architecture and Features
Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.
Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.
Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 9 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.
As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.
Performance
At 30 W, this Ryzen AI 9 series CPU is only just fast enough to compete with much older chips such as the Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in multi-threaded benchmarks, suggesting power efficiency is the focus here rather than sheer performance.
Graphics
The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.
Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors simultaneously. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.
Power consumption
The 365 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.
The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.
Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 → 100%n=42
Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 → 117%n=42
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.33
log 07. 13:32:40
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 18004 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 17625 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754566360s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Aug 2025 05:18:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18004 +0.004s ... 0.01s
#8 got single benchmarks 18004 +0.005s ... 0.015s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17625 +0.004s ... 0.019s
#10 got single benchmarks 17625 +0.012s ... 0.031s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.077s
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
