The Ryzen 7 8745HS is a China-only Hawk Point family chip that never received an official launch. Targeted at gaming and productivity laptops but widely used in mini-PCs, too, the 8745HS features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 4.9 GHz, along with the still fairly capable Radeon 780M iGPU. There is no NPU here.
As an APU meant for use within China, this Ryzen 7 should be fully compliant with the Chinese government-approved cryptography standards.
The only difference between the 8745HS and the 8745H is the slightly lower default wattage of the latter, potentially leading to slightly lower clock speeds.
Performance
We fully expect this Zen 4 architecture processor to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX (8 Zen 4 cores, 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz) meaning its multi-thread performance is a little better than the Core Ultra 9 185H but a few percentage points behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
Architecture and Features
Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support along with other improvements, like larger caches/registers/buffers across the board. Elsewhere, the 8745HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). There are 20 PCI-Express 4 lanes for connecting devices such as NVMe SSDs (1.97 GB/s per lane) and graphics cards; USB 4 / Thunderbolt support is onboard, too. Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered on to the motherboard for good (FP7r2 or FP8 socket interfaces).
Graphics
The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,600 MHz) can drive 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, AVC, HEVC). As far as gaming is concerned, many titles are still playable at 1080p as of early 2025 albeit with most settings dialed down do Lowest or Low.
Power consumption
This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing faster. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.
The Intel Celeron 867 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 867 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.
The performance of the Pentium 867 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore on a level of the 1.4 GHz Pentium U5600.
The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 867 is suited for small subnotebooks.
The Intel Celeron 847 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost are deactivated. The Celeron 847 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000.
The performance of the Pentium 847 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore on a level of the 1.2 GHz Pentium U5400.
The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 847 is suited for small subnotebooks.
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.33
log 19. 19:38:33
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 19649 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 3011 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 2730 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755625113s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:19:27 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.012s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 19649 +0.006s ... 0.018s
#9 got single benchmarks 19649 +0.008s ... 0.026s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3011 +0.001s ... 0.027s
#11 got single benchmarks 3011 +0.004s ... 0.031s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2730 +0.001s ... 0.032s
#13 got single benchmarks 2730 +0.011s ... 0.043s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.052s ... 0.095s
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
