Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i5-8600K

AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 16 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. The 4800HS is the 35 Watt version (-10 Watt) of the Ryzen 7 4800H.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics adapter with 7 CUs at up to 1,600 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB of L3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4800HS in our database is an impressively fast CPU that isn't afraid of picking a fight with the Intel Core i9-10980HK and the Core i7-11850H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Ryzen is fast enough for nearly all apps and games you could possibly throw at it, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 35 W. Which is too high to allow for passively cooled setups.

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is built with TSMC's 7 nm process leading to average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-8700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8700

The Intel Core i7-8700 is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.2 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the slightly higher clocked Core i7-8700K, the i7-8700 offers a lower TDP and no unlocked multiplier (no easy overclocking).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the previous quad-core Kaby Lake models. Single-core performance has not improved much. As a high-end model, the i7-8700 is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i5-8600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8600K

The Intel Core i5-8600K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to six threads simultaneously (no HyperThreading). According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i5-8600K is comparatively easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier.

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased significantly compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i5-8600K is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is basically identical to the previous generation Intel HD Graphics 630. Only some low demanding games are playable with this graphics card (see GPU page linked above).

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 4800HSIntel Core i7-8700Intel Core i5-8600K
CodenameRenoir-HS (Zen 2)Coffee Lake-SCoffee Lake-S
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-S
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS « 2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8086K3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 « 3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8086K3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-87003.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4200 MHz3200 - 4600 MHz3600 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 126 / 6
TDP35 Watt65 Watt95 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFP6FCLGA1151FCLGA1151
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800HS
31 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
482 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3869 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1634     avg: 1701     median: 1700.5 (11%)     max: 1767 Points
min: 1167     avg: 1194     median: 1199 (8%)     max: 1215 Points
min: 988     avg: 990     median: 989.5 (6%)     max: 991 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 186     avg: 186.5     median: 186.5 (52%)     max: 187 Points
min: 190     avg: 193     median: 192 (53%)     max: 197 Points
181 Points (50%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.9 Points (26%)
min: 12.9     avg: 13     median: 13 (17%)     max: 13.04 Points
10.8 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (52%)
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.18 Points
2.1 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5705 Points (34%)
min: 6992     avg: 7140     median: 7171 (43%)     max: 7257 Points
6875 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36313 Points (26%)
min: 34532     avg: 36153     median: 35384 (26%)     max: 38543 Points
32863 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i7-8700 +
43704 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i7-8700 +
9187 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
91.1 s (1%)
min: 143.7     avg: 198.4     median: 198.4 (2%)     max: 253.1 s
188.8 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.1 s (1%)
min: 5.469     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 8.061 s
5.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4642 Points (7%)
min: 5912     avg: 6252     median: 6332 (10%)     max: 6511 Points
4583 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
48392 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4655 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
99 fps (3%)
min: 70.9     avg: 75.7     median: 75.2 (2%)     max: 81.1 fps
min: 61     avg: 63.4     median: 63.4 (2%)     max: 65.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
216.5 fps (6%)
min: 221.6     avg: 230.6     median: 234.6 (6%)     max: 235.5 fps
min: 230.3     avg: 232.7     median: 232.7 (6%)     max: 235 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12 fps (21%)
9.5 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
min: 0.74     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.822 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.7 (20%)     max: 7.7 GB/s
5.4 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
284 Seconds (2%)
388.2 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12785 Points (27%)
min: 8738     avg: 10526     median: 11193 (24%)     max: 11646 Points
9078 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
min: 8.126     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.4 s
min: 8.72     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 8.8 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.3 s (1%)
min: 18.11     avg: 18.4     median: 18.5 (1%)     max: 18.6 s
min: 19.67     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (1%)     max: 19.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
561 s (2%)
min: 460.1     avg: 469.3     median: 472.2 (2%)     max: 475.7 s
min: 488.9     avg: 496.5     median: 496.5 (2%)     max: 504 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 i7-8700 +
45569 Points (35%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14924 Points (37%)
min: 13159     avg: 13302     median: 13310 (33%)     max: 13436 Points
min: 10708     avg: 10833     median: 10833 (27%)     max: 10958 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 i7-8700 +
64904 Points (53%)
74934 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 i7-8700 +
64897 Points (53%)
74763 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 i7-8700 +
63875 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16062 Points (41%)
min: 11130     avg: 11692     median: 11885 (30%)     max: 12060 Points
min: 8492     avg: 8523     median: 8522.5 (22%)     max: 8553 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21217 Points (38%)
min: 16818     avg: 17487     median: 17458 (31%)     max: 18184 Points
min: 12916     avg: 13019     median: 13018.5 (23%)     max: 13121 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8264     avg: 8441     median: 8440.5 (36%)     max: 8617 Points
min: 6755     avg: 6874     median: 6873.5 (29%)     max: 6992 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1188     avg: 1191     median: 1190.5 (45%)     max: 1193 Points
1170 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7540     avg: 7611     median: 7611 (14%)     max: 7682 Points
6250 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1196 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7878 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5114     avg: 5134     median: 5134 (51%)     max: 5154 Points
108%
1 i7-8700 +
5565 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 28937     avg: 29224     median: 29223.5 (29%)     max: 29510 Points
23220 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 21806     avg: 23062     median: 23061.5 (41%)     max: 24317 Points
18970 Points (34%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 4484     avg: 4486     median: 4486 (59%)     max: 4488 Points
4217 Points (55%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 22753     avg: 23926     median: 23925.5 (37%)     max: 25098 Points
19770 Points (31%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 4703     avg: 4709     median: 4708.5 (71%)     max: 4714 Points
4417 Points (66%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
786 ms (1%)
986 ms (1%)
1022 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 i7-8700 +
64.5 ms (1%)
68.1 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
214 Points (38%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
64.2 Watt (11%)
112.3 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.1 Watt (12%)
112.8 Watt (21%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
25.1 Points per Watt (19%)
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8700 → 90% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8600K → 79% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 17. 04:43:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11689 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9932 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9800 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760668991s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 Oct 2025 05:21:56 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11689 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 11689 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9932 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#11 got single benchmarks 9932 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9800 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#13 got single benchmarks 9800 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.043s ... 0.069s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)