Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 3350U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

AMD Ryzen 3 3350U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3350U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar Ryzen 3 3300U, the 3350U offers the same specifications according to AMD.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3350U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3450U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is a mobile SoC that was announced in Q2 2020 as a refresh. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.5 GHz (-200 MHz versus 3500U) with a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. 

The Picasso SoC uses the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows for higher clocks at similar power consumption.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

The performance of the Ryzen 5 3450U is slightly behind the Ryzen 3500U at the same TDP configuration due to the slower boost clock (-200 MHz).

The SoC is manufactured in the 12LP process at GlobalFoundries.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 3350UAMD Ryzen 5 3450U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketAM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R3 3350UAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R5 3450U

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3450U
28.7 pt (32%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2658     avg: 2927     median: 2926.5 (5%)     max: 3195 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 858     avg: 875     median: 875 (39%)     max: 892 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 292     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (37%)     max: 351 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1089     avg: 1168     median: 1168 (5%)     max: 1247 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 530     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (6%)     max: 603 Points
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 137     avg: 137.5     median: 137.5 (42%)     max: 138 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 15163     avg: 15782     median: 15878 (10%)     max: 16305 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3355     avg: 3375     median: 3359 (40%)     max: 3411 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.77     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (7%)     max: 3.43 fps
01234567Tooltip
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 834     avg: 919     median: 946 (7%)     max: 976 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.806 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4968     avg: 5979     median: 6400 (18%)     max: 6568 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
27926 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5106     avg: 5779     median: 5984 (15%)     max: 6248 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8985     avg: 9259     median: 9204 (17%)     max: 9587 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1887     avg: 2208     median: 2170 (11%)     max: 2567 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
864 Points (37%)
min: 698     avg: 819     median: 839 (36%)     max: 866 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2455 Points (9%)
min: 2565     avg: 2918     median: 2972 (10%)     max: 3123 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
853 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2630 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3486 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10200 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1170     avg: 1185     median: 1185 (1%)     max: 1200 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 145     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (38%)     max: 146 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 707     avg: 722     median: 722 (28%)     max: 737 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
37.3 Watt (6%)
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
36.2 Watt (8%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.6 Points per Watt (17%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3350U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3450U → 109% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 27. 20:57:09

#0 checking url part for id 13237 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13235 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.01s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13237 +0s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 13237 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13235 +0.005s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 13235 +0.011s ... 0.035s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.014s ... 0.048s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.021s ... 0.07s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.079s

#31 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.088s

#32 return log +0.004s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)