The AMD Ryzen 3 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.
The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.
The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.
AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a mobile Dual-Core-SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen+ cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.6 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.
The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.
The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.
In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Ryzen 3 3200U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.
AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3200U should be faster than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.16
log 19. 00:47:25
#0 checking url part for id 11181 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11191 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 0 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:06:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.013s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11181 +0.004s ... 0.017s
#7 got single benchmarks 11181 +0.008s ... 0.026s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11191 +0.003s ... 0.029s
#9 got single benchmarks 11191 +0.017s ... 0.045s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.078s ... 0.123s
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card