Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Core 2 Duo P7370

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.0 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. It is based on the 45nm Penryn core, but most likely Trusted Execution and Virtualization (VT-x) are disabled.

The P7370 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

Intel Core 2 Duo P8700

► remove from comparison Intel P8700

The Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 is a mid-range dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.53 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. Due to the smaller cache (Core 2 Duo T-Models got usually 6 MB at this clock rate), the TDP is only 25 Watt (instead of the 35 Watt of the T-models). Technically, the P8700 is a slower clocked P8800 CPU.

Due to the relatively high clock speed, modern games (in 2009) should not be limited by the CPU speed (in conjunction with a middle class graphics card). High end gamers should choose a higher clocked Dual Core instead (when using a high end GPU).

The P8700 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 1200 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.

The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7370Intel Core 2 Duo P8700Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2530 MHz2100 MHz
FSB10661066800
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt35 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm, 1.00V - 1.25V45 nm
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478PGA478
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$209 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P8700Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T6570 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2191 Points (18%)
min: 2516     avg: 2826     median: 2805 (23%)     max: 3057 Points
min: 1589     avg: 2167     median: 2274 (19%)     max: 2314 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4022 Points (5%)
min: 4741     avg: 5273     median: 5169 (6%)     max: 5882 Points
min: 2963     avg: 4042     median: 4276 (5%)     max: 4284 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
4768 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
2462 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P8700 +
min: 975     avg: 1020     median: 1038 (12%)     max: 1048 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P8700 +
min: 30.3     avg: 31.6     median: 31.6 (6%)     max: 32.9 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1705     avg: 1712     median: 1711.5 (4%)     max: 1718 Points
min: 2085     avg: 2231     median: 2253.5 (5%)     max: 2285 Points
min: 1326     avg: 1751     median: 1820 (4%)     max: 1886 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
25.2 s (5%)
min: 19.75     avg: 22.7     median: 20.5 (4%)     max: 30 s
min: 24     avg: 27.5     median: 25.1 (5%)     max: 36 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
60.3 s (3%)
min: 46.46     avg: 54     median: 50.4 (2%)     max: 69 s
min: 57.9     avg: 66.5     median: 61 (3%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 P8700 +
min: 1188     avg: 1227     median: 1227 (5%)     max: 1266 s
99%
1 T6570 +
min: 1342     avg: 1534     median: 1344 (6%)     max: 1916 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
17081 MIPS (8%)
min: 19740     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (10%)     max: 23332 MIPS
min: 15404     avg: 17907     median: 19000 (9%)     max: 19317 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
14679 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 17580     avg: 18070     median: 18070 (14%)     max: 18560 MFLOPS
min: 10662     avg: 13404     median: 14160 (11%)     max: 15390 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3060 Points (19%)
min: 4987     avg: 5478     median: 5364 (34%)     max: 6196 Points
min: 3419     avg: 4583     median: 4691 (29%)     max: 5134 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.9 Points (70%)
5.4 Points (77%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P8700 +
6.1 Points (78%)
82%
1 T6570 +
5 Points (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P8700 +
min: 4831     avg: 4872     median: 4872 (5%)     max: 4913 Points
80%
1 T6570 +
min: 3764     avg: 3902     median: 3902 (4%)     max: 4040 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 → 125% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 109% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 27. 06:27:13

#0 checking url part for id 455 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 451 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 455 +0s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 455 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 451 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 451 +0.025s ... 0.041s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0s ... 0.041s

#12 got single benchmarks 466 +0.012s ... 0.053s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.054s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.055s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.056s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.056s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.058s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.066s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.068s

#60 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.069s

#61 return log +0s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)