Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU vs Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, not to be confused with the A1000, P1000 or T1000, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,560 CUDA cores and 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4050 (Laptop) in disguise; consequently, both are powered by the AD107 chip and are fast enough to handle most games at 1080p with quality set to High. The product was launched in February 2024; it leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and the Ada Lovelace architecture. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 1000 Ada features 20 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 80 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,560 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 20%, and you get the RTX 2000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 1000 comes with just 6 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 96-bit wide, delivering a not-so-impressive bandwidth of ~192 GB/s.

The RTX 1000 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by an RTX 1000 Ada as of late February, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4050 Laptop. Based on that, we expect a run-of-the-mill RTX 2000 Ada to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 54 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 27,000 points
  • around 50 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • upwards of 30 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 12.1 TFLOPS" of performance, a downgrade compared to 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 1000 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is exactly the case with the RTX 1000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 1000 Ada can easily be half as fast as the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 1000 is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

The Apple M2 Pro 19-Core-GPU is an integrated graphics card by Apple offering all 19 cores in the M2 Pro Chip.

The graphics card has no dedicated graphics memory but can use the fast LPDDR5-6400 unified memory with a 256 bit bus (up to 200 GBit/s). The GPU clocks from 444 MHz to 1398 MHz and was maintaining the 1398 MHz in games.

According to Apple, the performance should be 30% higher than the old 16-core-GPU in the M1 Pro.

The GPU is intended to use Apple Metal 2 API and could still be based on the older PowerVR architectures (last used in the Apple A10). A new feature in the MacBook Pro 14 and 16 of 2023 is the support for HDMI 2.1 and 8k output.

The Apple M2 Pro is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC. The power consumption of the GPU part in the M2 Pro is slightly below 20 Watt in games (Borderlands 3 measured with powermetrics).

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A500, P500 and the T500, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,048 CUDA cores and a paltry 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. We believe this graphics card to be a heavily cut-down GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop; therefore, both should employ the Ada Lovelace AD107 chip built with TSMC's 5 nm process. The RTX 500 was launched in February 2024. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for this graphics card is moderately wide at 35 W to 60 W leading to noticeable performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same graphics card.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 500 Ada features 16 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 64 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,048 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 25%, and you get the RTX 1000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 500 comes with just 4 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 64-bit wide, delivering an anemic bandwidth of ~128 GB/s.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by the RTX 500 Ada as of late February, it's realistic to expect it to be just a little slower than the average RTX 3050 Laptop. Yes, that's right; the RTX 500 has no chance of matching the RTX 4050 Laptop in sheer performance due to the reduced core count and smaller memory bus. Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 9.2 TFLOPS" of performance, a significant downgrade compared to 12.1 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 1000 Ada.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 500 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. The RTX 500 Ada got luckier than many, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at 35 W while the highest value is 60 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). Real-world performance of the slowest RTX 500 Ada will probably be around 40% lower than that of the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 500 Ada is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPUNvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
M2 Max 38-Core GPU 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU 16
M2 10-Core GPU 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU 8 @ 1.4 GHz
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
CodenameGN21-X2
ArchitectureAda LovelaceAda Lovelace
Pipelines2560 - unified19 - unified2048 - unified
TMUs8064
ROPs3232
Raytracing Cores2016
Tensor / AI Cores8064
CacheL2: 12 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz12000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width96 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6LPDDR5-6400GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynonono
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s128 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)20 Watt60 Watt (35 - 60 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm5 nm5 nm
PCIe4.0 x164.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement27.02.2024 17.01.2023 27.02.2024
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.comimages.nvidia.com
Core Speed444 - 1398 (Boost) MHz
CPU in M2 Pro 19-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M2 Pro12 x 2424 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 12968     avg: 12983     median: 12982.5 (15%)     max: 12997 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
97 Seconds (10%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
140.9 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 92.1     avg: 92.2     median: 92.2 (37%)     max: 92.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 210.4     avg: 210.6     median: 210.6 (38%)     max: 210.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 565.3     avg: 567     median: 566.7 (42%)     max: 568 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 434.4     avg: 435.2     median: 435.2 (49%)     max: 436 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 748     avg: 748     median: 748.2 (16%)     max: 748.4 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1126.4     avg: 1131     median: 1131.2 (66%)     max: 1136 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 1967.2     avg: 1970     median: 1969.6 (16%)     max: 1972 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
50447 Points (15%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Metal
82134 Points (53%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
49.6 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
55.9 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 1.028     avg: 1     median: 1 (85%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
39.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
33.5  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
29.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
26.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
34  fps
low 1280x720
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
75.9 79 ~ 77 fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
54 60.3 ~ 57 fps
high 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
40 40.6 ~ 40 fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
29 30.4 ~ 30 fps
low 1280x720
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
269  fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
84  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
54  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
40  fps
QHD 2560x1440
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
25  fps
low 1280x720
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
169  fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
80  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
72  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
63  fps
QHD 2560x1440
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU:
51  fps
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty39.633.529.326.5
Baldur's Gate 334
Borderlands 377574030
Total War: Three Kingdoms26984544025
Shadow of the Tomb Raider16980726340
The Witcher 35751
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1
2

2
2
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
1




For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 20. 14:54:49

#0 checking url part for id 12424 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11568 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12426 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:37:06 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.14s ... 0.141s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.142s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.142s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12424 +0.035s ... 0.176s

#9 got single benchmarks 12424 +0s ... 0.177s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11568 +0.002s ... 0.179s

#11 got single benchmarks 11568 +0.008s ... 0.186s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12426 +0.002s ... 0.188s

#13 got single benchmarks 12426 +0.001s ... 0.188s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.188s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.217s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.217s

#17 Got 41 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.224s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.224s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.228s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.013s ... 0.241s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.241s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.243s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)