Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N97 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G

Intel Processor N97

► remove from comparison Intel N97

The Intel Processor N97 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance should be between the Intel Processor N100 and Intel Processor N200 and clearly below the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. 

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N97 has a base power consumption of 12 W and therefore double the amount of the N100. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 8cx

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Compute Platform (or SD8cx) is a ARM based SoC for Windows laptops. It integrates a similar CPU part as the Snapdragon 855 (same cores but without the Prime Core feature) and is manufactured in 7nm at TSMC. The 4 Kryo 495 Gold cores are based on the ARM Cortex-A76 architecture (for performance) and clocked at 2.84 GHz under load (no single core Turbo). The 4 Kryo 495 Silver cores are small ARM Cortex-A55 cores for power efficiency and clocked at 1.9 GHz under load. According to Qualcomm, the clock speed should not be reduced under constant load with typical (fanless) cooling. The integrated X24 LTE modem supports up to 2 Gbps download speeds. Furthermore, the SoC integrates ac-Wifi and a dual-channel 32-bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller.

The processor performance should be similar to a Intel Core i5 8th gen U-series (e.g. i5-8250U) according to Qualcomm. However, this is only the case for native ARM64 compiled Windows apps which are not that many (in mid 2019). 32 bit applications and games for AMD/Intel run in a rather slow emulation and 64 bit apps wont start at all (but an emulator should come in Windows in 2021).

The integrated Adreno 680 graphics card is a beefier version of the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 855 and should be twice as fast as the old Adreno 630 (in Windows laptops) and offer a 60% higher efficiency.

The chip is very power efficient as its produced at Samsung in the modern 7 nm process (7LPP). Therefore, laptops using the Snapdragon 8cx can be passively cooled (no fan) and should not throttle under constant load.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 8cx Gen 2 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G Compute Platform (or SD8cx Gen2, SC8180XP) is a ARM based SoC for Windows laptops. It integrates a similar CPU part as the Snapdragon 855 (same cores but without the Prime Core feature) and is manufactured in 7nm at Samsung. The 4 Kryo 495 Gold cores are based on the ARM Cortex-A76 architecture (for performance) and clocked at 3.15 GHz under load. The 4 Kryo 495 Silver cores are small ARM Cortex-A55 cores for power efficiency and clocked at 1.8 GHz under load (most likely).

Compared to the predecessor, the Snapdragon 8cx, the Gen 2 offers higher clock speeds and an integrated 5G modem (X55 with Sub-6 GHz and mmWave support). Wi-Fi was also bumped up to Wi-Fi 6

The processor performance should be similar to a Intel Core i5 8th gen U-series (e.g. i5-8250U) according to Qualcomm. However, this is only the case for native ARM64 compiled Windows apps which are not that many (in mid 2019). 32 bit applications and games for AMD/Intel run in a rather slow emulation and 64 bit apps wont start at all (but an emulator should come in Windows in 2021).

The integrated Adreno 680 graphics card could also be a bit higher clocked.

The chip is very power efficient as its produced at TSMC in the modern 7 process. Therefore, laptops using the Snapdragon 8cx can be passively cooled (no fan) and should not throttle under constant load.

ModelIntel Processor N97Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cxQualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameAlder Lake-NCortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G3.15 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Microsoft SQ13 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx « 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G « 3.15 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Microsoft SQ13 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Clock <=3600 MHz2840 MHz3150 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 88 / 8
TDP12 Watt7 Watt7 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 680Qualcomm Adreno 680
Architecturex86ARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
FeaturesX24 LTE Modem, Adreno 680 GPUX24 LTE Modem, Adreno 680 GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N97
27.1 pt (38%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N97 +
63 Points (44%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N97 +
192 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N97 +
2913 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N97 +
973 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N97 +
371 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N97 +
1115 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N97 +
479 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N97 +
161 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N97 +
6 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N97 +
1.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N97 +
5445 Points (33%)
11%
1 SD 8cx +
591 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N97 +
15323 Points (11%)
27%
1 SD 8cx +
4187 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N97 +
24158 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N97 +
8567 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N97 +
523 s (6%)
101%
1 SD 8cx +
442.1 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N97 +
16.8 s (3%)
100%
1 SD 8cx +
14.6 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N97 +
2321 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N97 +
13174 MIPS (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N97 +
4019 MIPS (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N97 +
34.9 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N97 +
174.8 fps (40%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N97 +
3.5 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N97 +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N97 +
0.5 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N97 +
2.9 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N97 +
2014 Seconds (26%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N97 +
1020 Seconds (7%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N97 +
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N97 +
6461 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N97 +
18.4 s (4%)
102%
1 SD 8cx +
10.9 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N97 +
38.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N97 +
786 s (3%)
101%
1 SD 8cx +
564 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N97 +
15578 Points (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N97 +
6118 Points (17%)
3095 Points (8%)
1975 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N97 +
50003 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N97 +
50545 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N97 +
52858 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N97 +
4565 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N97 +
6473 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N97 +
2493 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1300 Points (35%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
3181 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N97 +
1060 Points (45%)
700 Points (30%)
min: 793     avg: 797     median: 797 (34%)     max: 801 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N97 +
2757 Points (5%)
2760 Points (5%)
min: 3088     avg: 3116     median: 3115.5 (6%)     max: 3143 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1052 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
2738 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N97 +
4703 Points (47%)
3313 Points (33%)
2355 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N97 +
10893 Points (12%)
11047 Points (12%)
7502 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N97 +
975 ms (1%)
1464 ms (2%)
1284 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 SD 8cx +
29364 Points (26%)
32979 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N97 +
145.3 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N97 +
191.4 Points (40%)
116 Points (24%)
132 Points (28%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N97 +
844 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
37.1 Watt (6%)
17 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
28.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
13.5 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.6 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N97 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx → 78% n=7

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G → 73% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 17:47:53

#0 checking url part for id 14969 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11394 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13120 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14969 +0.02s ... 0.055s

#8 got single benchmarks 14969 +0.01s ... 0.065s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11394 +0.003s ... 0.068s

#10 got single benchmarks 11394 +0.01s ... 0.078s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13120 +0.003s ... 0.081s

#12 got single benchmarks 13120 +0.009s ... 0.09s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.24s ... 0.33s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.33s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)