Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N95 vs Intel Processor N200

Intel Processor N95

► remove from comparison Intel N95

The Intel Processor N95 (sometimes also called Celeron N95 or Pentium N95) is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. Compared to the similar Processor N100, the N95 offers a slightly higher TDP and therefore maybe a slightly improved sustained performance.

Performance

The average N95 in our database is in the same league as the Pentium 7505 and the Core i3-1115G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. That's not a great result, to put it mildly.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N95 has a base power consumption of 12 W (compared to the 6 W of the N100) and is therefore well suited for thin and light systems. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Processor N95Intel Processor N200
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 « - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock <=3400 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N95
26.1 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100%
N95 +
60 Points (42%)
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
100%
N95 +
min: 181     avg: 182.3     median: 182 (3%)     max: 184 Points
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2528     avg: 2711     median: 2769 (3%)     max: 2786 Points
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N95 +
min: 618     avg: 820     median: 914 (39%)     max: 935 Points
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N95 +
min: 229     avg: 306.8     median: 350 (39%)     max: 357 Points
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N95 +
min: 976     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (3%)     max: 1067 Points
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 408     avg: 437     median: 445 (3%)     max: 452 Points
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 98     avg: 136.2     median: 151 (45%)     max: 155 Points
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (7%)     max: 5.62 Points
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N95 +
min: 1.3     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (46%)     max: 1.86 Points
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 3562     avg: 4529     median: 4783 (29%)     max: 5141 Points
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 12582     avg: 13741     median: 13854 (10%)     max: 14545 Points
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 20429     avg: 21521     median: 22075 (15%)     max: 22275 Points
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N95 +
min: 5904     avg: 7259     median: 7574 (9%)     max: 8177 Points
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N95 +
min: 519.662     avg: 541     median: 537.3 (6%)     max: 568.939 s
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N95 +
min: 16.449     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18.213 s
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N95 +
min: 2181     avg: 2303     median: 2319.5 (4%)     max: 2391 Points
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
N95 +
min: 11654     avg: 12003     median: 12177 (7%)     max: 12224 MIPS
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N95 +
min: 2972     avg: 3521     median: 3803 (45%)     max: 3866 MIPS
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N95 +
min: 29.65     avg: 31.7     median: 32.4 (11%)     max: 32.45 fps
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N95 +
min: 145.25     avg: 158.2     median: 162.2 (37%)     max: 163.3 fps
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N95 +
min: 3.03     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (6%)     max: 3.29 fps
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N95 +
min: 0.236     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
119%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N95 +
min: 0.492     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.501 GB/s
117%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N95 +
min: 2.4     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (7%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
119%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
N95 +
min: 2161     avg: 2202     median: 2186.5 (28%)     max: 2275 Seconds
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N95 +
min: 1103     avg: 1120     median: 1113 (8%)     max: 1152 Seconds
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N95 +
min: 0.83     avg: 0.9     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 1.135 sec
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N95 +
min: 5612     avg: 5863     median: 5952 (13%)     max: 6017 Points
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N95 +
min: 7.058     avg: 18.8     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 24.428 s
100%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N95 +
min: 17.513     avg: 39.7     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 50.772 s
100%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N95 +
min: 532.8     avg: 845     median: 824.7 (4%)     max: 1025.92 s
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
N95 +
min: 13896     avg: 14556     median: 14595 (13%)     max: 14929 Points
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 5084     avg: 5571     median: 5661 (15%)     max: 5806 Points
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 36089     avg: 44673     median: 46477 (38%)     max: 47272 Points
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 36329     avg: 44756     median: 46489 (38%)     max: 47322 Points
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 47145     avg: 48606     median: 49062 (41%)     max: 49955 Points
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 4105     avg: 4214     median: 4217 (11%)     max: 4345 Points
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N95 +
min: 5701     avg: 5923     median: 5952 (11%)     max: 6062 Points
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N95 +
min: 2081     avg: 2301     median: 2346 (10%)     max: 2386 Points
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 934     avg: 1132     median: 1227 (37%)     max: 1234 Points
956 Points (29%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2800     avg: 2958     median: 2961 (12%)     max: 3114 Points
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 761     avg: 917     median: 999 (42%)     max: 1013 Points
928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2391     avg: 2577     median: 2566 (5%)     max: 2793 Points
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 749     avg: 910     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1005 Points
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 2382     avg: 2537     median: 2531 (8%)     max: 2737 Points
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 3411     avg: 4100     median: 4450 (44%)     max: 4553 Points
102%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N95 +
min: 9662     avg: 10169     median: 10228 (11%)     max: 10798 Points
9989 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N95 +
min: 1026     avg: 1186     median: 1056 (1%)     max: 1577 ms
100%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N95 +
min: 93.2     avg: 121.3     median: 126.8 (36%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N95 +
min: 121.3     avg: 163.5     median: 178.3 (37%)     max: 183.4 Points
171.3 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
N95 +
min: 555     avg: 716     median: 764 (29%)     max: 820 Points
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 31.5 Watt
102%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 18.9     avg: 21.4     median: 20.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
101%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N95 +
min: 6.24     avg: 8.4     median: 7.3 (5%)     max: 12.6 Watt
101%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N95 +
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)
76%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N95 → 100% n=51

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 75% n=51

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 00:55:36

#0 checking url part for id 14981 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14981 +0.017s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 14981 +0.022s ... 0.064s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.016s ... 0.08s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.012s ... 0.093s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.342s ... 0.435s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.459s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)