Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G68 MP2 vs Samsung Xclipse 940

ARM Mali-G68 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP2

The ARM Mali-G68 MP2 (or G68MC2) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP2 version uses two of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced mid 2021 in the Samsung Exynos W920 for smartwatches. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

show full text
ARM Mali-G68 MP2Samsung Xclipse 940
Xclipse 900 Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines2 - unified
Shared Memorynoyes
technology5 nm4 nm
Date of Announcement14.09.2021 09.10.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Mali-G68 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 13308 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos W10005 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos W9302 x 1400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos W9202 x 1180 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
0 Points (0%)
min: 1821     avg: 1919     median: 1919 (4%)     max: 2017 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1348     avg: 1351     median: 1351 (1%)     max: 1354 Points
min: 12652     avg: 13765     median: 13472.5 (7%)     max: 15464 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
351 Points (0%)
min: 3933     avg: 4172     median: 4188.5 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
0 Points (0%)
min: 6649     avg: 8042     median: 8361 (4%)     max: 8797 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
937 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
2494 Points (10%)
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
2324 Points (6%)
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.6 fps
min: 30     avg: 32.5     median: 33 (12%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.7     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (1%)     max: 5.9 fps
min: 69     avg: 79.3     median: 79.5 (14%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
16 fps (1%)
min: 153     avg: 159.8     median: 155 (11%)     max: 176 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
14 fps (1%)
min: 130     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (13%)     max: 139 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
24 fps (1%)
min: 214     avg: 231     median: 229.5 (5%)     max: 251 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
40 fps (2%)
min: 269     avg: 296.8     median: 299.5 (12%)     max: 319 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP2
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 59     avg: 59.5     median: 59.5 (0%)     max: 60 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
min: 378     avg: 388     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 63138     avg: 63179     median: 63178.5 (5%)     max: 63219 Points
min: 613580     avg: 652246     median: 649947 (52%)     max: 695509 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
25 fps (1%)
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
1287 Points (0%)
min: 13590     avg: 16104     median: 16919 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
1286 Points (0%)
min: 16011     avg: 16689     median: 16082.5 (4%)     max: 18578 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.78     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 2.85 Watt
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.8 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP2 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 1033% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP2:
30.9  fps
188%
Xclipse 940:
56.2 58 59 60 ~ 58 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G68 MP2:
17.9 42.2 ~ 30 fps
180%
Xclipse 940:
47 50.8 58 59 ~ 54 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP2:
29.2 38.2 ~ 34 fps
235%
Xclipse 940:
59.1 81 90 90 ~ 80 fps
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP2:
29.3 59.1 ~ 44 fps
134%
Xclipse 940:
57 58.8 60 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
Xclipse 940:
39.2 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP2:
43  fps
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP2:
42.5  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G68 MP2 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 184%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 167%

ARM Mali-G68 MP2Samsung Xclipse 940
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact30.9305854
PUBG Mobile3444805940
Asphalt 9: Legends4342.5
ARM Mali-G68 MP2Samsung Xclipse 940
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3





2


1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1


2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 15. 08:58:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10947 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760511521s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 Oct 2025 05:19:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.028s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10947 +0.01s ... 0.038s

#9 got single benchmarks 10947 +0.001s ... 0.039s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0s ... 0.039s

#11 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.01s ... 0.049s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.049s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.052s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.065s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.065s

#17 Got 32 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.076s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.076s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.076s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.078s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.078s

#22 return log +0.001s ... 0.079s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)