Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU vs Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU

Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU

The Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU is a self-designed graphics card in the Apple M3 SoC and according to Apple with forty cores. According to Apple, the GPU uses a new architecture and now offers dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration.

The GPU can access up to 128 GB LPDDR5-6400 unified memory via a 512 bit memory bus (max 400 GBit/s). Thanks to dynamic caching, the GPU should only reserve as much memory as is required.

Since the SoC is manufactured in the current 3nm (probably N3B) at TSMC. According to powermetrics, the GPU requires up to 60 watts (chip incl. CPU total 78 watts).

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, not to be confused with the A1000, P1000 or T1000, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,560 CUDA cores and 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4050 (Laptop) in disguise; consequently, both are powered by the AD107 chip and are fast enough to handle most games at 1080p with quality set to High. The product was launched in February 2024; it leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and the Ada Lovelace architecture. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 1000 Ada features 20 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 80 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,560 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 20%, and you get the RTX 2000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 1000 comes with just 6 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 96-bit wide, delivering a not-so-impressive bandwidth of ~192 GB/s.

The RTX 1000 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by an RTX 1000 Ada as of late February, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4050 Laptop. Based on that, we expect a run-of-the-mill RTX 2000 Ada to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 54 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 27,000 points
  • around 50 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • upwards of 30 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 12.1 TFLOPS" of performance, a downgrade compared to 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 1000 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is exactly the case with the RTX 1000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 1000 Ada can easily be half as fast as the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 1000 is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU

The Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU is a self-designed graphics card in the Apple M3 Pro (with 11 CPU cores) and offers fourteen of the eighteen cores available on the chip. The graphics card uses a new architecture and now offers dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration.

The GPU can access up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 unified memory via a 192-bit memory bus (max 150 GBit/s). Thanks to dynamic caching, the GPU only reserves as much memory as is required.

The entire chip is manufactured in the current 3nm process (probably N3B) at TSMC.

Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUNvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
Apple M3 Series
M3 Max 40-Core GPU 40
M3 Max 30-Core GPU 30
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU 18
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU 14
M3 10-Core GPU 10
M3 9-Core GPU 9
M3 8-Core GPU 8
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
M3 Max 40-Core GPU 40
M3 Max 30-Core GPU 30
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU 18
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU 14
M3 10-Core GPU 10
M3 9-Core GPU 9
M3 8-Core GPU 8
Pipelines40 - unified2560 - unified14 - unified
Memory TypeLPDDR5-6400GDDR6LPDDR5-6400
Shared Memorynonono
Power Consumption53 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm5 nm5 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlargemedium sized
Date of Announcement31.10.2023 27.02.2024 31.10.2023
CodenameGN21-X2
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
TMUs80
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores20
Tensor / AI Cores80
CacheL2: 12 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width96 Bit
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
CPU in M3 Max 40-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M3 Max 16-Core16 x 2748 MHz, 78 W? MHz? MHz
CPU in M3 Pro 14-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core11 x 2748 MHz, 27 W? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 31268     avg: 31336     median: 31335.5 (36%)     max: 31403 Points
12094 Points (14%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
min: 29.6     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (3%)     max: 32 Seconds
73 Seconds (8%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 136.23     avg: 137.4     median: 137.4 (8%)     max: 138.52 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
129.9 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 188.2     avg: 196     median: 196 (73%)     max: 203.7 fps
79 fps (30%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 416     avg: 431     median: 431 (77%)     max: 446 fps
178.7 fps (32%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 858     avg: 863     median: 863 (64%)     max: 868 fps
481.9 fps (36%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 556     avg: 560     median: 560 (53%)     max: 564 fps
376.3 fps (36%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 1163     avg: 1178     median: 1178 (25%)     max: 1193 fps
565 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1557     avg: 1573     median: 1573 (66%)     max: 1589 fps
818 fps (34%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2893     avg: 2942     median: 2941.5 (23%)     max: 2990 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
1299 fps (10%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 91413     avg: 91416     median: 91415.5 (24%)     max: 91418 Points
42798 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Metal
min: 154675     avg: 155214     median: 155214 (86%)     max: 155752 Points
68043 Points (38%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 87.7     avg: 91.6     median: 91.6 (13%)     max: 95.4 Watt
32.8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 92.5     avg: 100.8     median: 100.8 (22%)     max: 109 Watt
42.8 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 0.633     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (73%)     max: 0.995 fps per Watt
0.9 fps per Watt (82%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.723     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (73%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt
min: 1.189     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (99%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 42.8     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (62%)     max: 43.4 dB(A)
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
25.1 dB(A) (36%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
242  fps
80%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
193  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
207 212 ~ 210 fps
60%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
125  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
138 139 ~ 139 fps
48%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
67  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
97 121 ~ 109 fps
49%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
53  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
82 82 ~ 82 fps
43%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
35  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
45  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
44  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
43.7 44.4 ~ 44 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
40.8 42.8 ~ 42 fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
35.5 37.4 ~ 36 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
96  fps
44%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
42  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
90  fps
43%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
39  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
60  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
51  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
170 170 ~ 170 fps
44%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
75  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
109 113 ~ 111 fps
45%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
49.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
80 84 ~ 82 fps
44%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
35.9  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
54 58 ~ 56 fps
40%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
22.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
145 150 ~ 148 fps
45%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
66  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
135 143 ~ 139 fps
43%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
60  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
118 122 ~ 120 fps
44%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
53  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
86 88 ~ 87 fps
39%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
34  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
med. 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
56  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
53 54 ~ 54 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
50 51 ~ 51 fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
49 49 ~ 49 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
87  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
69 92 ~ 81 fps
48%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
39  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
high 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
77 79 ~ 78 fps
101%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
79  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
53 54 ~ 54 fps
93%
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU:
50  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
M3 Max 40-Core GPU:
51 52 ~ 52 fps

Average Gaming Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU → 53%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 48%

Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUNvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Total War Pharaoh24221013910982193125675335
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty4544444236
Baldur's Gate 39690604239
Star Wars Jedi Survivor51
Total War: Three Kingdoms17011182567549.535.922.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1481391208766605334
Far Cry 556545149
The Witcher 3878139
GTA V7854527950
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUNvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1

1

2

3

2
4
2

4
4
1

4
3



< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



1


2
1

2
3

6

1
2




For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.34
log 09. 12:47:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11636 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12424 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12032 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760006861s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:57 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.028s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11636 +0.023s ... 0.051s

#10 got single benchmarks 11636 +0.005s ... 0.055s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12424 +0s ... 0.056s

#12 got single benchmarks 12424 +0.003s ... 0.059s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 12032 +0s ... 0.059s

#14 got single benchmarks 12032 +0.003s ... 0.062s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.081s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.081s

#18 Got 71 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.086s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.086s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.087s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.09s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.09s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)