Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10885H is almost 20 percent slower than the Core i7-10875H

Intel Core i9-10885H is almost 20 percent slower than the Core i7-10875H (Image source: Intel)
Intel Core i9-10885H is almost 20 percent slower than the Core i7-10875H (Image source: Intel)
You're probably going to need a beefy laptop and cooling solution if you want to maximize the performance potential of the vPro Core i9-10885H. The budget Dell Precision 3551, for example, is only able to sustain a clock rate of just 2.7 GHz when the CPU is capable of running much faster.

Intel vPro-enabled processors are typically slower than their non-vPro counterparts due to the overhead necessary for the integrated security features. The vPro-enabled Core i7-10810U, for example, is about 10 to 15 percent slower than the consumer-oriented Core i7-10710U even though the higher-digit naming convention might suggest otherwise.

The latest vPro CPU we tested was the 10th gen Comet lake-H Core i9-10885H as found on the Dell Precision 3551. When compared to its consumer-oriented counterpart the Core i7-10875H, the Core i9 CPU is slower in multi-threaded applications by about 20 percent according to CineBench benchmarks. Other benchmarks like Blender, 7-Zip, LibreOffice, and HWBOT show a smaller gap of about 10 percent between the two processors.

The 20 percent performance deficit against the Core i7-10875H is wider than anticipated, but we do believe the i9-10885H is able to narrow the gap if configured on laptops with better cooling. The CPU in our Precision 3551 test unit, for example, would stabilize at just 2.7 GHz when at 100 percent utilization which is only 300 MHz above the base clock rate. Intel rates the processor for much higher Turbo Boost clock rates of up to 5.3 GHz meaning there is plenty of untouched performance headroom if laptops are able to support it. The Precision 3551, being a budget mobile workstation, likely wasn't designed to run a Core i9 CPU anywhere near its maximum potential.

It's unlikely that we'll get to test many more Core i9-10885H laptops as this particular processor is quite uncommon, but it's something to keep in mind for those who want to squeeze as much performance as possible out of their vPro-enabled business laptops or mobile workstations.

(October 16, 2020 update: Dell has confirmed that the Precision 3551 uses a 35 W CPU design while the Latitude 7550 is a 45 W design which explains why our Core i9 Precision can perform slower in multi-threaded workloads than a Core i7 Latitude.)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1986 - 4176, n=32)
3455 Points +23%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
2798 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (430 - 524, n=32)
486 Points +6%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
460 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1003 - 1833, n=38)
1554 Points +23%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
1264 (1113.77min - 1263.86max) Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 220, n=37)
204 Points +4%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
197 Points
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
348 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (259 - 535, n=30)
327 Seconds * +6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
5397 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5071 - 5780, n=31)
5360 MIPS -1%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (29844 - 49562, n=31)
43117 MIPS +17%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
36740 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=29)
1304 Points +7%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
1216 Points
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5715 - 8620, n=29)
7734 Points +12%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
6914 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)
11.7 fps +10%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
10.6 fps
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)
50.3 s * -10%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
45.9 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)
0.582 sec * -2%
Dell Precision 3000 3551
Intel Core i9-10885H
0.572 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Price comparison

Read all 7 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2020 10 > Intel Core i9-10885H is almost 20 percent slower than the Core i7-10875H
Allen Ngo, 2020-10-12 (Update: 2020-10-17)