Huawei MediaPad T2 7.0 Pro
Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei MediaPad T2 7.0 Pro
Source: Computerbild - Heft 14/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Helpix RU→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Helpix RU→EN
Positive: Impressive display; long battery life; compact size; good price; decent front camera. Negative: Inflexible fingerprint sensor; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2016
Source: Zoom RU→EN
Positive: Attractive design; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2016
CommentQualcomm Adreno 405: Integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. Depending on the used SoC the clock rate is around 500 MHz and features 48 unified shaders.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
Mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU cores (Cortex-A53, 64-bit capable) and an Adreno 405 GPU. Manufactured in a 28 nm LP process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
This weight is typical for smartphones.
Huawei: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese company founded in 1987 with focus on telecommunications hardware and 170000 employees. In the first quarter of 2016, Huawei had a market share of 8.2% in the smartphone market, making it the third-largest smartphone manufacturer in the world. Compared to the same quarter of 2015, Huawei increased its market share by more than 58%.
In 2014, Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. The name Huawei is usually not listed for these products.
There are a lot of reviews on Huawei phones with slightly above average ratings (as of 2016).
79%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.