Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 9820

Samsung Exynos 9810

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9810

The Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series (at least partly). It integrates eight CPU cores (octa core) in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at 2.9 GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 1.9 GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung (most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898).

The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports Cat.18/13 LTE for up to 1.2 Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload.

As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 (only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20). Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card.

The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos (as before 4k120 H.265/HEVC, H.264 and VP9 de- and encoding). 

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process (the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process) that should also help with some of the performance gains.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 765G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (SD765G Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core, called Kryo 475) divided into two clusters. A fast performance cluster contains two ARM Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2.4 GHz (prime core) and 2.2 GHz (gold core) and a power efficiency cluster with six small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds.

Compared to the normal Snapdragon 765, the 765G is optimized for gaming. This means the graphics card is higher clocked and the chip also supports additional software features (Snapdragon Elite Gaming like Game Smoother, Game Fast Loader and Game Network Latency Manager).

The processor performance is quite comparable to the old Snapdragon 730G. Only the single core performance can be slightly better, thanks to the higher clocked prime core (+200 MHz = 9% higher).

The chip is one of the first SoCs that integrate a 5G modem. It is called Snapdragon X52 and supports speeds of up to 3.7 / 1.6 Mbps (down- and upload) and mmWave and Sub-6.

The integrated Adreno 620 is also higher clocked compared to the one in the normal 765 and should result in 10% higher performance (according to QC).

The integrated AI engine uses the GPU, CPU and dedicated cores to reach a theoretical maximum performance of 5.5 TOPS.

The processor is manufactured in the modern and energy efficient 7nm EUV process at Samsung. 

Samsung Exynos 9820

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9820

The Samsung Exynos 9 9820 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2018 and was first integrated in the Samsung Galaxy S10 smartphones early 2019. The SoC integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.7 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.3 GHz. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. The single core performance is, thanks to the big custom cores, a strong suit of the CPU and reaches the levels of Apples mobile SoCs. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The predecessor Exynos 9810 can be bested by around 17% in our first benchmarks with the Galaxy S10 Plus.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 8nm LPP process that should also help with some of the performance gains.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GSamsung Exynos 9820
CodenameExynos M3 / Cortex-A55Kryo 475 Gold / SilverExynos M3 / Cortex-A55
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung Exynos
Series: Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98251.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98201.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 « - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G « 1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7651.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Samsung Exynos 98251.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9820 « 1.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Clock <=2900 MHz1800 - 2400 MHz1900 - 2700 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology10 nm7 nm8 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 (max 2.9 GHz), 4x Cortex-A55 (max 1.9 GHz) big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerAdreno 620 GPU, X52 5G/LTE Modem, Hexagon 696 DSP, Specra 355 ISPARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP18Qualcomm Adreno 620ARM Mali-G76 MP12
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturernews.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 765G
0.6 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9820
0.8 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18756     avg: 23944     median: 26226 (22%)     max: 26851 Points
min: 31297     avg: 32016     median: 32228.5 (27%)     max: 32308 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2546     avg: 2717     median: 2601.5 (24%)     max: 3120 Points
min: 2925     avg: 3123     median: 3043.5 (29%)     max: 3480 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2561     avg: 2752     median: 2649.5 (30%)     max: 3148 Points
min: 3077     avg: 3226     median: 3087 (35%)     max: 3513 Points
825 Points (32%)
2259 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
679 Points (3%)
836 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2033 Points (6%)
2306 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3688     avg: 3721     median: 3698 (37%)     max: 3776 Points
min: 2689     avg: 2811     median: 2863 (29%)     max: 2882 Points
min: 4499     avg: 4510     median: 4505.5 (45%)     max: 4529 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8786     avg: 8874     median: 8874 (9%)     max: 8963 Points
min: 6213     avg: 7214     median: 7665 (8%)     max: 7765 Points
min: 10162     avg: 10366     median: 10374 (10%)     max: 10553 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3786 Points (42%)
3072 Points (34%)
min: 4881     avg: 4958     median: 4957.5 (55%)     max: 5034 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8491 Points (12%)
7661 Points (11%)
min: 10000     avg: 10109     median: 10109 (15%)     max: 10218 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5895     avg: 5915     median: 5915 (9%)     max: 5935 Points
min: 7690     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (12%)     max: 7957 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1961     avg: 1965     median: 1965 (29%)     max: 1969 Points
min: 2382     avg: 2388     median: 2387.5 (36%)     max: 2393 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 895     avg: 1039     median: 1039 (8%)     max: 1183 Points
3754 Points (30%)
min: 1870     avg: 1985     median: 1984.5 (16%)     max: 2099 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1898     avg: 2002     median: 2001.5 (18%)     max: 2105 Points
3987 Points (36%)
min: 2997     avg: 3050     median: 3049.5 (28%)     max: 3102 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 10213     avg: 10328     median: 10328 (20%)     max: 10443 Points
13267 Points (26%)
min: 14240     avg: 14552     median: 14552 (29%)     max: 14864 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5651     avg: 5656     median: 5656 (11%)     max: 5661 Points
6137 Points (12%)
min: 7271     avg: 7404     median: 7403.5 (15%)     max: 7536 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 6025     avg: 6099     median: 6098.5 (16%)     max: 6172 Points
7961 Points (21%)
min: 8338     avg: 8493     median: 8492.5 (22%)     max: 8647 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2060     avg: 2509     median: 2394 (3%)     max: 3189 ms
min: 2359     avg: 3721     median: 2733.5 (3%)     max: 15230 ms
min: 1823     avg: 1961     median: 1890.5 (2%)     max: 2240 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 12933     avg: 14397     median: 14711.5 (11%)     max: 15233 Points
min: 3592     avg: 16671     median: 18551 (14%)     max: 19143 Points
min: 18697     avg: 20121     median: 20469.5 (15%)     max: 20849 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 63     avg: 67.8     median: 68 (12%)     max: 72 Points
min: 20     avg: 71.5     median: 76 (14%)     max: 101 Points
115 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
99150 Points (100%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 214090     avg: 218110     median: 217950 (74%)     max: 222290 Points
0 Points (0%)
min: 269219     avg: 275038     median: 273831 (93%)     max: 283270 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 7800     avg: 8235     median: 8294 (25%)     max: 8612 Points
min: 12202     avg: 12486     median: 12323.5 (38%)     max: 13096 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 53528     avg: 55588     median: 55698 (68%)     max: 57538 Points
min: 67209     avg: 68326     median: 68203 (84%)     max: 69689 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 91292     avg: 92956     median: 92887 (29%)     max: 94690 Points
min: 148074     avg: 148912     median: 149162 (46%)     max: 149249 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 80534     avg: 86884     median: 88577 (54%)     max: 91540 Points
min: 97864     avg: 99848     median: 99722 (61%)     max: 102082 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 236552     avg: 243663     median: 243861 (43%)     max: 250577 Points
min: 327454     avg: 329572     median: 328778 (58%)     max: 333277 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
58288 Points (49%)
64371 Points (54%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
51005 Points (41%)
71200 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
117851 Points (22%)
166540 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
102716 Points (37%)
128208 Points (46%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
329860 Points (32%)
430319 Points (41%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 121702     avg: 154312     median: 154312 (20%)     max: 186922 Points
135%
1 SD 765G +
208510 Points (27%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2385     avg: 2407     median: 2407 (13%)     max: 2429 Points
min: 3822     avg: 8112     median: 4325 (23%)     max: 18932 Points
min: 5013     avg: 5063     median: 5075 (27%)     max: 5101 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 5088     avg: 5342     median: 5341.5 (11%)     max: 5595 Points
min: 4439     avg: 13287     median: 15644 (33%)     max: 19273 Points
min: 8407     avg: 8786     median: 8830 (19%)     max: 9121 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5184     avg: 5411     median: 5305 (35%)     max: 5851 Points
min: 7595     avg: 7769     median: 7758 (51%)     max: 7966 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5736     avg: 6022     median: 5891 (29%)     max: 6571 Points
min: 9557     avg: 9777     median: 9771.5 (49%)     max: 10008 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 765G +
18532 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 765G +
9189 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 765G +
437 Points (16%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G → 128% n=25

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9820 → 140% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 30. 21:32:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11878 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11322 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753903968s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 9632 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11878 +0.005s ... 0.019s

#11 got single benchmarks 11878 +0.016s ... 0.035s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11322 +0.003s ... 0.038s

#13 got single benchmarks 11322 +0.006s ... 0.044s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.015s ... 0.059s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.069s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.086s

#18 return log +0s ... 0.086s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)