Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Samsung Exynos 9610

Samsung Exynos 9611

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9611

The Samsung Exynos 9611 (or Exynos 7 Series 9611) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.3 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.7 GHz for power efficiency. Compared to the older Exynos 9610, the 9611 supports higher resolutions for the rear faced camera.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9611 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 810

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 810

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.27 GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.88 GHz (bigLITTLE). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU (Da Vinci architecture). The integrates LTE modem supports Cat.12/13 with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin ISP4.0. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the chip.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

Samsung Exynos 9610

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9610

The Samsung Exynos 9610 (or Exynos 7 Series 9610) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.3 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.7 GHz for power efficiency.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9610 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9611HiSilicon Kirin 810Samsung Exynos 9610
SeriesSamsung ExynosHiSilicon Samsung Exynos
CodenameExynos 7 SeriesCortex-A76/-A55Exynos 7 Series
Series: Exynos Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9611 « 1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96101.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96091.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 « 1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Samsung Exynos 96111.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9610 « 1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96091.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Clock1700 - 2300 MHz1880 - 2270 MHz1700 - 2300 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology10 nm7 nm10 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3ARM Mali-G52 MP6ARM Mali-G72 MP3
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.samsung.com
FeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (1.88 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9611
0.5 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810
0.7 pt (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13103     avg: 18907     median: 20010 (17%)     max: 20393 Points
min: 18123     avg: 23401     median: 24426 (21%)     max: 27654 Points
14353 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1463     avg: 2115     median: 2260 (27%)     max: 2332 Points
min: 3501     avg: 3731     median: 3720 (44%)     max: 3972 Points
2266 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1402     avg: 2087     median: 2279 (26%)     max: 2336 Points
min: 3463     avg: 3749     median: 3782 (43%)     max: 4003 Points
2241 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347.3     median: 347.5 (15%)     max: 349 Points
min: 592     avg: 598     median: 598 (25%)     max: 604 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1207     avg: 1310     median: 1323.5 (2%)     max: 1387 Points
min: 1890     avg: 1920     median: 1919.5 (3%)     max: 1949 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 349 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1063     avg: 1229     median: 1299 (4%)     max: 1326 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2836 Points (28%)
1721 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7891 Points (9%)
5605 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
0 Points (0%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4332     avg: 4863     median: 4786 (6%)     max: 6212 ms
min: 2472     avg: 2950     median: 2646 (3%)     max: 3731 ms
3897 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7442     avg: 9667     median: 9810 (9%)     max: 10687 Points
min: 15947     avg: 16825     median: 16604 (15%)     max: 17925 Points
10322 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 46     avg: 53.4     median: 55 (11%)     max: 57 Points
min: 71     avg: 83.7     median: 83 (17%)     max: 97 Points
62 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
7831 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
36958 Points (45%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
37658 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
61747 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
144194 Points (25%)
min: 55189     avg: 62040     median: 58957 (49%)     max: 71973 Points
min: 45079     avg: 53673     median: 47554 (38%)     max: 68387 Points
min: 56693     avg: 68299     median: 64645 (12%)     max: 83558 Points
min: 92494     avg: 97432     median: 94457 (34%)     max: 105346 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 152185     avg: 175473     median: 177197 (17%)     max: 187087 Points
min: 259370     avg: 291444     median: 295579 (28%)     max: 319383 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
150124 Points (20%)
217082 Points (29%)
172805 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5080     avg: 5572     median: 5587 (37%)     max: 5925 Points
min: 7541     avg: 8133     median: 7695 (50%)     max: 9164 Points
5827 Points (38%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5777     avg: 6166     median: 6144 (31%)     max: 6697 Points
min: 9189     avg: 10361     median: 9824 (49%)     max: 12070 Points
7029 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
4294 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9611 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 146% n=9

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9610 → 103% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 09. 22:11:38

#0 checking url part for id 11543 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11346 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:39:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.059s ... 0.06s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.06s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11543 +0.017s ... 0.077s

#8 got single benchmarks 11543 +0.02s ... 0.097s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 +0.014s ... 0.11s

#10 got single benchmarks 12116 +0.013s ... 0.123s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11346 +0.003s ... 0.126s

#12 got single benchmarks 11346 +0.008s ... 0.134s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.134s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.088s ... 0.221s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.224s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.226s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.228s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.23s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.233s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.235s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.238s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.24s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.066s ... 0.307s

#24 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.307s

#25 return log +0s ... 0.307s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)