, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Samsung Exynos 9610

Samsung Exynos 9611

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9611

The Samsung Exynos 9611 (or Exynos 7 Series 9611) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.3 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.7 GHz for power efficiency. Compared to the older Exynos 9610, the 9611 supports higher resolutions for the rear faced camera.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9611 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

Samsung Exynos 9610

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9610

The Samsung Exynos 9610 (or Exynos 7 Series 9610) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.3 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.7 GHz for power efficiency.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9610 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

Samsung Exynos 9611Samsung Exynos 9610
Samsung ExynosSamsung Exynos
Exynos 7 SeriesExynos 7 Series
Series: Exynos Exynos 7 Series
» Samsung Exynos 96111.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96101.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9609 compare1.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96111.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Exynos 7 Series
» Samsung Exynos 96101.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9609 compare1.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Exynos 7 Series
1700 - 2300 MHz1700 - 2300 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
10 10
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3ARM Mali-G72 MP3
ArchitectureARMARM
Samsung Exynos Exynos 9611Samsung Exynos Exynos 9610

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9611
23.8 pt (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13103     avg: 18907     median: 20010 (21%)     max: 20393 Points
14353 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1463     avg: 2115     median: 2260 (28%)     max: 2332 Points
2266 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1402     avg: 2087     median: 2279 (33%)     max: 2336 Points
2241 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 (22%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5605 (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347     median: 347 (19%)     max: 349
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1063     avg: 1229     median: 1299 (8%)     max: 1326
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 345     avg: 347     median: 347.5 (18%)     max: 349
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1207     avg: 1310     median: 1323.5 (8%)     max: 1387
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4332.2     avg: 4863     median: 4786.2 (8%)     max: 6212.4 ms
3897 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7442     avg: 9667     median: 9810 (14%)     max: 10687 Points
10322 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 46     avg: 53.4     median: 55 (19%)     max: 57 Points
62 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
7831 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
36958 Points (45%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
37658 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
61747 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
144194 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 152185     avg: 175473     median: 177197 (17%)     max: 187087 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
150124 Points (20%)
172805 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5080     avg: 5572     median: 5587 (37%)     max: 5925 Points
5827 Points (38%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5777     avg: 6166     median: 6144 (31%)     max: 6697 Points
7029 Points (35%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9611 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9610 → 103% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 23. 00:44:20

#0 checking url part for id 11543 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11346 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:08:13 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11543 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 11543 +0.011s ... 0.021s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11346 +0s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 11346 +0.005s ... 0.027s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.038s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)