Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4505 vs Intel Core m3-8100Y vs Intel Celeron N5100

Intel Celeron N4505

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4505

The Intel Celeron N4505 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive and small desktops and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N4505 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is built with Intel's first-gen 10 nm process, just like Ice Lake family processors.

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 750 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4505 in our database is just as fast as AMD's dual-core Athlon Silver 3050e and Intel's previous-gen Celeron N4100, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, the Celeron is good for basic day-to-day activities but not much more than that, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This Celeron series SoC has a default TDP, also known as the long-term Power Limit, of 10 W, which is low enough to allow for passively cooled designs.

The N4505 is manufactured on the first-gen or the second-gen (no exact data available) 10 nm Intel process making for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core m3-8100Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core m3-8100Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and will be announced around August 2018. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.1 - 3.4 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder.  Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core m3-7Y32), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the old 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts (previous generations were 4.5 Watt), and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

Intel Celeron N5100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5100

The Intel Celeron N5100 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5100 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the N5100 as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 20% slower than the N6000, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. In other words, this is a fairly slow processor that is unlikely to make anybody happy.

Power Consumption

Like most other N-class Intel processors, this Celeron has a 6 W default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is rather low; a small metal plate is all it takes to dissipate heat generated by such a CPU.

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured on Intel's first-generation or second-generation [no exact data available] 10 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N4505Intel Core m3-8100YIntel Celeron N5100
CodenameJasper LakeAmber Lake-YJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Amber LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y « 1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1100 - 3400 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 44 / 4
TDP10 Watt5 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1338BGABGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXTDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 950 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
$281 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4505
19.2 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - m3-8100Y
19.5 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1114     avg: 1149     median: 1148.5 (1%)     max: 1183 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 592     avg: 604     median: 603.5 (25%)     max: 615 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 224     avg: 230     median: 230 (25%)     max: 236 Points
min: 232     avg: 257.7     median: 243 (26%)     max: 298 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 431     avg: 441.5     median: 441.5 (1%)     max: 452 Points
min: 382     avg: 440.7     median: 413 (1%)     max: 527 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 191     avg: 197.5     median: 197.5 (1%)     max: 204 Points
min: 157     avg: 190.8     median: 179.5 (1%)     max: 247 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (29%)     max: 108 Points
min: 91     avg: 101.3     median: 96.6 (27%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.46     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.27     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (30%)     max: 1.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3606     avg: 3622     median: 3621.5 (22%)     max: 3637 Points
3850 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6831     avg: 6861     median: 6860.5 (5%)     max: 6890 Points
6055 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10063 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5294 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1120.44     avg: 1132     median: 1131.7 (13%)     max: 1143 s
906 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.481     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
18.6 s (4%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
36.1 s (19%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1000     avg: 1062     median: 1061.5 (2%)     max: 1123 Points
1646 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 5871     avg: 6004     median: 6003.5 (3%)     max: 6136 MIPS
min: 4937     avg: 6246     median: 6245.5 (4%)     max: 7554 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2971     avg: 3047     median: 3046.5 (36%)     max: 3122 MIPS
min: 2683     avg: 2983     median: 2982.5 (35%)     max: 3282 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 13.5     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (5%)     max: 13.8 fps
11.2 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
72.3 fps (17%)
58.3 fps (13%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 fps
min: 1.42     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 1.96 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.099     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (3%)     max: 0.101 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.184     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.192 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.3 GB/s (3%)
1.7 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 5719     avg: 5742     median: 5741.5 (73%)     max: 5764 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2845     avg: 2899     median: 2899 (20%)     max: 2953 Seconds
min: 1893     avg: 2206     median: 2206 (16%)     max: 2519 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.162     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.224 sec
min: 0.942     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (23%)     max: 1.204 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3165     avg: 3214     median: 3214 (7%)     max: 3263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.931     avg: 20.9     median: 20.9 (5%)     max: 21.9 s
11.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 44.275     avg: 45.7     median: 45.7 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
29.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 997     avg: 1003     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1009.94 s
818 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6156 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2700     avg: 2720     median: 2719.5 (7%)     max: 2739 Points
min: 2165     avg: 2747     median: 2579.5 (6%)     max: 3665 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
24182 Points (20%)
min: 24135     avg: 26883     median: 26882.5 (22%)     max: 29630 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 24027     avg: 24121     median: 24121 (20%)     max: 24215 Points
min: 20632     avg: 22076     median: 22076 (18%)     max: 23520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 25571     avg: 25808     median: 25808 (21%)     max: 26045 Points
min: 18736     avg: 26552     median: 26177 (22%)     max: 34742 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2130     avg: 2131     median: 2130.5 (5%)     max: 2131 Points
min: 1941     avg: 2084     median: 1968 (5%)     max: 2460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2979     avg: 2993     median: 2992.5 (5%)     max: 3006 Points
min: 2692     avg: 2986     median: 2837.5 (5%)     max: 3577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
894 Points (4%)
min: 943     avg: 1061     median: 992 (4%)     max: 1248 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
508 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
852 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 647     avg: 654     median: 653.5 (26%)     max: 660 Points
min: 809     avg: 846     median: 845.5 (33%)     max: 882 Points
631 Points (25%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1225     avg: 1232     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1239 Points
min: 1178     avg: 1397     median: 1396.5 (3%)     max: 1615 Points
1788 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 645     avg: 648     median: 648 (3%)     max: 651 Points
765 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1205     avg: 1215     median: 1214.5 (4%)     max: 1224 Points
1279 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2942     avg: 2946     median: 2945.5 (29%)     max: 2949 Points
4159 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5078     avg: 5082     median: 5082 (5%)     max: 5086 Points
6934 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4043 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6676 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5446 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2702 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5958 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3081 Points (46%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8823 Points (47%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6189 Points (43%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5047 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6364 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6113 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1578     avg: 1688     median: 1688 (2%)     max: 1798 ms
min: 1295     avg: 1652     median: 1715 (2%)     max: 2163 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
353.4 ms (4%)
min: 117.4     avg: 211     median: 211 (2%)     max: 304.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24502 Points (19%)
min: 14701     avg: 21429     median: 20267 (15%)     max: 29318 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 79.3     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (22%)     max: 81.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 113.3     avg: 114.2     median: 114.2 (20%)     max: 115 Points
min: 128     avg: 134.5     median: 135.5 (24%)     max: 139 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5961 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
25599 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9760 Points (64%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13598 Points (68%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 442     avg: 444     median: 444 (17%)     max: 446 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.3     avg: 19     median: 19 (3%)     max: 19.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 15.4     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4505 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core m3-8100Y → 121% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5100 → 121% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 04. 21:15:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13113 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10086 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13077 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754334907s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Aug 2025 18:06:20 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13113 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 13113 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10086 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 10086 +0.007s ... 0.025s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13077 +0.001s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 13077 +0.004s ... 0.03s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.077s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.077s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)