Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Processor N50

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N50

► remove from comparison Intel N50

The Intel Processor N50 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 2 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Processor N100 (4 cores, 3.4 GHz) due to the reduced core count. The single thread performance however, should be similar. Compared to older processors, the N50 should be comparable to dual core Skylake based CPUs like the Intel Core m3-8100Y (2x 3.4 GHz, 5W).Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only up to 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N50 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Celeron N4500Intel Processor N50
CodenameJasper LakeAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 « 1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz1000 - 3400 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
2 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
16.6 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (19%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1507 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 457     avg: 459.5     median: 459.5 (11%)     max: 462 Points
258%
N50 +
1185 Points (30%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 662     avg: 710     median: 709.5 (3%)     max: 757 Points
285%
N50 +
2024 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (23%)     max: 598 Points
150%
N50 +
891 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
132%
N50 +
1339 Points (2%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 91.2     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (27%)     max: 108 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (17%)     max: 141.3 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
2.3 MB/s (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
128.8 MB/s (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
91 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
2205 MB/s (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 6206     avg: 6520     median: 6519.5 (3%)     max: 6833 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7404     avg: 7641     median: 7641 (28%)     max: 7878 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
381 Points (14%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.06     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (6%)     max: 5.49 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N50 → 206% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 17:08:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14971 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759158515s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:06:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.009s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14971 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 14971 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.048s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)