Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U vs Intel Core i5-9600K vs AMD Athlon Gold 3150U

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3050U

The AMD Athlon Silver 3050U is a mobile processor for thin and light entry level laptops. It is based on the Picasso series (e.g. Ryzen 3000U APUs) and offers two Zen cores clocked at 2.3 to 3.2 GHz without SMT (two threads at once) and 4 MB of L3 Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 2 and offers only 2 CUs (128 shaders) clocked at up to 1,100 MHz.

In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Athlon Silver 3050C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the 3050U, as of August 2023. Expect the chip to be just a few percentage points slower than the Athlon 3150U (two Zen cores, 4 threads, up to 3.3 GHz). This kind of performance should suffice for most day-to-day tasks but not much more than that.

Power consumption

This Athlon series chip has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and peformance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the APU is built with a 14 nm process leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-9600K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-9600K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 6 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 6 threads) clocked at 3.7 - 4.6 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard. It is manufactured in the second iteration of the improved 14nm process (14nm++).

Compared to the older Core i5-8600K, the 9600K offers about 10 to 15% higher performance. As the CPU still offers 6 cores and threads, the improvements are mostly due to the higher clock speeds. As a fast mid range desktop CPU, the i5-9600K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.15 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 150 Watt and higher.

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3150U

The AMD Athlon Gold 3150U is a mobile processor for thin and light entry level laptops. It is based on the Dali series (Raven Ridge Dual Core) and offers two Zen cores clocked at 2.6 to 3.3 GHz with SMT (four threads at once) and 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 3 and offers only 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz.

In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Athlon Gold 3150C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

Performance

The average 3150U in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-10110U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, this is an entry-level chip, as of mid 2022. While not slow by any means, it is anything but fast, either.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Athlon has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Most will go for a higher value to reach higher performance levels. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The AMD 3150U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process resulting in low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Athlon Silver 3050UIntel Core i5-9600KAMD Athlon Gold 3150U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Coffee LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameDali (Zen)Coffee Lake-RDali (Zen)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Dali (Zen)
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U « 2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K « 3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2300 - 3200 MHz3700 - 4600 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB192 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB9 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 26 / 62 / 4
TDP15 Watt95 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm14++ nm14 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C95 °C
SocketFP5FCLGA1151FP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 2 ( - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2
$262 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Athlon 3150U
22.8 pt (32%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
303 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
795 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1094 Points (7%)
352 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
193 Points (58%)
117 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11 Points (14%)
4 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (56%)
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7205 Points (44%)
3639 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
33950 Points (25%)
7566 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
39494 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9318 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
176.2 s (2%)
1280 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6 s (1%)
40.1 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5903 Points (9%)
1631 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
8752 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3065 MIPS (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
68.8 fps (24%)
22.5 fps (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
250 fps (58%)
106.6 fps (25%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8 fps (14%)
2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (11%)
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.6 GB/s (15%)
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
444.4 Seconds (3%)
1348 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.9 sec (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10974 Points (23%)
4189 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
13.9 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
421.1 s (2%)
727 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
37593 Points (33%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11938 Points (32%)
4287 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
78929 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
78531 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80235 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9031 Points (23%)
3923 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13701 Points (24%)
5692 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6071 Points (26%)
1862 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
743 Points (31%)
1217 Points (51%)
751 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1429 Points (3%)
5855 Points (10%)
1847 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5916 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
23810 Points (26%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
145.9 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
134 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Silver 3050U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9600K → 287% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Gold 3150U → 115% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 01. 07:30:16

#0 checking url part for id 11695 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11231 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11693 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.026s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11695 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#8 got single benchmarks 11695 +0.019s ... 0.047s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11231 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#10 got single benchmarks 11231 +0.008s ... 0.058s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11693 +0.02s ... 0.078s

#12 got single benchmarks 11693 +0.009s ... 0.087s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.087s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.271s ... 0.358s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.358s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)