Asus AsusPro B9440UA (Core i7, 16 GB) Laptop Review Update

The reason for this update is to analyze the performance difference of the Asus B9440UA-GV0100T (Intel Core i5-7200U, 8 GB of RAM, 256 GB SSD) presently priced at about 1050 Euros ($1200) and the approximately 300 Euros (~$343) more expensive GV0101T with an i7-7500U, 16 GB of working memory, and a 512 GB SSD. Since the models do not differ otherwise, we refer to our actual test for information concerning case, input devices, speakers, etc.
We use the same comparison devices in this test, but also add the GV0100T for making a direct comparison possible.
Maintenance
It should not be surprising that such a thin and light laptop does not allow accessing the battery from outside or that a maintenance hatch is not installed. However, the base tray is secured by ten Philips screws and it is easy to remove. The Wi-Fi module, SSD, fan, and the glued battery can then be accessed. However, opening can result in the loss of warranty.
Performance
Processor
While the GV0100T sports the very popular Intel Core i5-7200U (2x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Hyperthreading, TDP 15 W), the i7-7500U (2x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz) is inside the GV0101T. The only difference between the two Kaby Lake processors is found in the base and Turbo speeds. The i7 clocks 200 and 400 MHz faster. In view of the tight TDP, we will have to wait and see whether the i7 can convert its clock speed advantage in a 1:1 higher performance.
Clock speeds in Cinebench R15 loop GV0101T (i7-7500U)
Clock speeds in Cinebench R15 loop GV0100T (i5-7200U)
Looking at Cinebench R15, the Core i7 can outperform the i5 in the cheaper AsusPro B9440UA by 7% in the single-core test and by 5% in the multi-core test. When comparing all 7200 models assessed to date, the one in the GV0101T only presents an average performance when all cores are loaded, and it even falls behind the mainstream by approximately 4% in the single-core test. As a reminder: the i5-7200U in the GV0100T does a better job compared with its colleagues and is in the upper field there.
As the graphs about the clock behavior during permanent load illustrate, the i7 can barely distinguish itself from the i5 during permanent load. The low ULV TDP of just 15 watts will not be as limiting on the i5 in terms of Turbo utilization though. This lets the performance gain of the more expensive CPU shrink to a negligible degree in most applications in practice. Idle scenarios with short load peaks might benefit (insignificantly) from the much higher single thread Turbo. Like the GV0100T, the scores do not change in battery mode.
System Performance
The assessment of the total performance with PCMark 8 confirms that the slightly faster platform of Asus' B9440UA-GV0101T can hardly convert its higher potential in higher performance.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3689 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4760 points | |
Help |
Storage Device
Although the GV0101T only sports a higher capacity model (512 GB) of the same Mikron SSD as in the cheaper GV0100T (256 GB), the 512 GB model is slightly better especially at reading small random blocks of 64 threads simultaneously (except in server systems, it is usually not more than 4 threads in practice) and in the write speeds according to AS SSD. CrystalDiskMark 3.0 sees this a bit differently, though.
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0101T Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN) | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -5% | 196% | -12% | ||
Seq Read | 488.6 | 511 5% | 1325 171% | 490.2 0% | |
Seq Write | 458.1 | 487 6% | 1190 160% | 419.6 -8% | |
4K Read | 25.23 | 27.57 9% | 56.4 124% | 24.21 -4% | |
4K Write | 82.7 | 80.2 -3% | 134.4 63% | 77.5 -6% | |
4K-64 Read | 360.1 | 367.4 2% | 1465 307% | 234 -35% | |
4K-64 Write | 261.3 | 168.7 -35% | 862 230% | 252.9 -3% | |
Score Read | 434 | 446 3% | 1654 281% | 307 -29% | |
Score Write | 390 | 298 -24% | 1115 186% | 372 -5% | |
Score Total | 1052 | 979 -7% | 3617 244% | 842 -20% |
Graphics Card
The Intel HD 620 GPUs in both B9440UA models present exactly the same specifications and clock rates. Thus, they logically achieve an almost identical score in 3DMark 11. The advantages of the more expensive GV0101T are within the measuring tolerances in 3DMark (2013).
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0101T | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0101T | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0101T | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
Fujitsu LifeBook U747 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1706 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6488 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 931 points | |
Help |
Gaming Performance
We compared the achieved frames per second using the lowest settings in Witcher 3. The allegedly faster GV0101T even lags behind by approximately 2 FPS, which is also within the measuring tolerance. It is imaginable that the CPU part of the i7 clocks a bit higher than that of the i5. Consequently, it treats itself to a big piece of the TDP pie at expense of the HD 620 and that the i7's HD 620 cannot quite reach the clock speed of the i5.
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12.8 |
Energy Management
Battery Runtime
We now dedicate ourselves to the battery life in our practical Wi-Fi test with reduced brightness. The nominally slower GV0100T only manages 3% more with an identical battery capacity. This indicates a very similar power consumption, and it is again within the range of measuring tolerances.
We recently published a special article on how to recharge lithium-ion batteries properly with some useful tips.
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0101T i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh | Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -17% | -24% | -34% | 3% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 516 | 430 -17% | 394 -24% | 338 -34% | 531 3% |
Reader / Idle | 782 | 718 | 468 | 1137 | |
H.264 | 490 | 367 | |||
Load | 117 | 77 | 89 | 126 |
Verdict
Pros
Cons
The GV0101T model with an i7, 16 GB of RAM and a 512 GB SSD is roughly 300 Euros (~$343) more expensive than the GV0100T with 8 GB of working memory and a 256 GB SSD. However, apart from the larger storage device, it hardly offers an added value. Frequent, excessive multitasking and/or Photoshop with several large layers will likely benefit from the double RAM size. Pure office users will be better off with the cheaper model in our opinion.
One last note: Other testers of the GV0101T model reported about a sometimes poor or delayed touchpad responsiveness. We did not notice this in our actual review of the GV0100T, but our review sample of the more expensive model also caused occasional problems.
This link leads to our first review of the Asus AsusPro B9440UA-GV0100T.