Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core m5-6Y54 vs Intel Celeron N5095

Intel Core m5-6Y54

► remove from comparison Intel 6Y54

The Intel Core m5-6Y54 is a very power efficient dual-core SoC based on the Skylake architecture and has been launched in September 2015. Thanks to its extremely low TDP, the CPU can be found in passively cooled tablets and 2-in-1 notebooks. In addition to two CPU cores with Hyper-Threading clocked at 1.1 - 2.7 GHz (2 cores: max. 2.4 GHz), the chip also integrates an HD Graphics 515 GPU and a dual-channel LPDDR3-1866/DDR3L-1600 memory controller. The chip is manufactured using a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Skylake replaces both Haswell and Broadwell and brings the same microarchitecture in every TDP class from 4.5 to 45 W. The extensive improvements of the Skylake design include increased out-of-order buffers, optimized prefetching and branch prediction as well as additional performance gains through Hyper-Threading. Overall, however, performance per clock has been increased by only 5 to 10 percent (compared to Haswell) respectively under 5 percent (compard to Broadwell), which is quite modest for a new architecture ("Tock").

Performance

Actual performance of the Core m5-6Y54 greatly depends on cooling capabilities and TDP configuration of the related device. While the CPU may be almost similar to a Core i5-6200U (Skylake, 15 W) in short benchmarks, its performance will fall short of a Core i3-6100U under continuous full load. Overall, the chip has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as somewhat more demanding applications.

Graphics

The integrated graphics unit called HD Graphics 515 represents the "GT2" version of the Skylake GPU (Intel Gen. 9). The 24 Execution Units, also called EUs, are clocked at 300 - 900 MHz (limited by available TDP headroom) and offer a performance somewhere in range of the old HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell, 15 W). Only a few games of 2015 can be played smoothly in lowest settings. For more information about performance and features, check our page for the HD Graphics 515.

Power Consumption

Specified at a TDP of 4.5 W (including CPU, GPU and memory controller), the CPU is suited for passively cooled notebooks and tablets. Optionally, the TDP can be lowered to 3.5 watts (cTDP down) or raised to 7 watts (cTDP up), affecting both heat dissipation and performance.

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095 and the N5095A is that the latter comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database is about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095 has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095 is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Core m5-6Y54Intel Celeron N5095
CodenameSkylakeJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Core m5Intel Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core m5-6Y57 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m5-6Y54 « 1.1 - 2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2700 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP4.5 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
Die Size99 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGABGA1338
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 515 (300 - 900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
20.6 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (2%)     max: 2219 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (25%)     max: 621 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (25%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (2%)     max: 844 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
6Y54 +
min: 137     avg: 215     median: 222.5 (1%)     max: 260 Points
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (2%)     max: 379 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
6Y54 +
min: 80     avg: 99.3     median: 103 (29%)     max: 111 Points
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (29%)     max: 109 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
6Y54 +
min: 1.59     avg: 2.3     median: 2.4 (3%)     max: 2.75 Points
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 4.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
6Y54 +
min: 0.57     avg: 1     median: 1.1 (26%)     max: 1.26 Points
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (30%)     max: 1.29 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
6Y54 +
min: 3026     avg: 3796     median: 3962 (24%)     max: 4235 Points
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
6Y54 +
min: 3848     avg: 6594     median: 6898.5 (5%)     max: 8731 Points
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
6Y54 +
7979 Points (5%)
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (11%)     max: 17278 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
6Y54 +
4927 Points (6%)
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (7%)     max: 5451 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
6Y54 +
970 s (11%)
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
6Y54 +
26.1 s (5%)
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
6Y54 +
2111 Points (3%)
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (3%)     max: 1781 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (6%)     max: 11168 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
6Y54 +
min: 9.93     avg: 11.1     median: 11.1 (0%)     max: 12.3 fps
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (1%)     max: 25.25 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
6Y54 +
min: 57.7     avg: 62.6     median: 62.6 (2%)     max: 67.5 fps
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (3%)     max: 120.25 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
6Y54 +
min: 0.146     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.151 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
6Y54 +
min: 0.251     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (4%)     max: 0.257 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
6Y54 +
1.5 GB/s (4%)
2.5 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2936 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
6Y54 +
min: 2449     avg: 2935     median: 2935 (6%)     max: 3421 Points
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
6Y54 +
min: 14.64     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (3%)     max: 15.04 s
20.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
6Y54 +
min: 34.13     avg: 35.6     median: 35.6 (2%)     max: 36.99 s
45.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
6Y54 +
min: 785     avg: 822     median: 822 (4%)     max: 859 s
1039 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
6Y54 +
min: 1467     avg: 2533     median: 2529 (6%)     max: 3465 Points
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (11%)     max: 4439 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
6Y54 +
min: 22752     avg: 26801     median: 25498 (21%)     max: 32152 Points
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (34%)     max: 42494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
6Y54 +
21905 Points (18%)
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (34%)     max: 42477 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
6Y54 +
29241 Points (23%)
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (38%)     max: 48186 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
6Y54 +
min: 1383     avg: 2036     median: 1908.5 (5%)     max: 2813 Points
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
6Y54 +
min: 1961     avg: 3151     median: 3118 (6%)     max: 3990 Points
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (7%)     max: 1696 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
520 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1529 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (22%)     max: 659 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (4%)     max: 2052 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (29%)     max: 2929 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (8%)     max: 7968 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6Y54 +
3352 Points (37%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6Y54 +
6160 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6Y54 +
min: 5189     avg: 5415     median: 5522 (10%)     max: 5533 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6Y54 +
min: 2588     avg: 2736     median: 2784 (36%)     max: 2837 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6Y54 +
5538 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6Y54 +
2779 Points (42%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 6Y54 +
8242 Points (44%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 6Y54 +
6695 Points (46%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 6Y54 +
5273 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 6Y54 +
5480 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 6Y54 +
5926 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
6Y54 +
min: 1286     avg: 1326     median: 1309 (2%)     max: 1400 ms
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 6Y54 +
min: 95.4     avg: 96.6     median: 96.6 (1%)     max: 97.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 6Y54 +
min: 23217     avg: 25680     median: 26308.5 (17%)     max: 26885 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (25%)     max: 96.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (22%)     max: 127.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (18%)     max: 495 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core m5-6Y54 → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 147% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 30. 11:39:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6962 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761820742s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6962 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 6962 +0.01s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.006s ... 0.027s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.064s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)