Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G72 MP18 vs ARM Mali-G52 MP1

ARM Mali-G72 MP18

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G72 MP18

The ARM Mali-G72 MP18 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in early 2018 in the Exynos 9810 (e.g. Galaxy S9). It integrates 18 of the 32 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.

In our benchmarks it slightly below a Adreno 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G52 MP1

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G52 MP1

The ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (or G52MC1) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based Tablets). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek MT8168 with a clock speed of up to 800 MHz.

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek MT8168) is clearly below the G52 MP2 version in the entry level. That means its not well suited for demanding 3D Android games like PUBG Mobile.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G72 MP18ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrostBifrost
Pipelines18 - unified1 - unified
Core Speed850 MHz800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology16 nm12 nm
Date of Announcement01.01.2018 29.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G72 MP18GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98108 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G52 MP1GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC T6128 x 1800 MHz614 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 8508 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
JLQ JR5108 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek MT81684 x 2000 MHz? MHz800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz800 - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP18
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G52 MP1:
27.5 29.5 30 32 33 40 56 59 ~ 38 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
40  fps
78%
Mali-G52 MP1:
19 20 25 28 30 36 39 39 40 ~ 31 fps
med.
Mali-G52 MP1:
24 37 ~ 31 fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
40  fps
65%
Mali-G52 MP1:
16 17.5 21 27.5 28 29 30 30 30 33 ~ 26 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
50%
Mali-G52 MP1:
30  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
low 1280x720
Mali-G52 MP1:
19  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G52 MP1:
27  fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30  30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
97%
Mali-G52 MP1:
28 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
80%
Mali-G52 MP1:
17 25.5 29 ~ 24 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP18 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 74%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 78%

ARM Mali-G52 MP1lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet38
PUBG Mobile313126
Arena of Valor30
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)19
Asphalt 8: Airborne27
Asphalt 9: Legends2924
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
2


1

2
1










ARM Mali-G72 MP18lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile4040
World of Tanks Blitz60
Arena of Valor6060
Shadow Fight 360
Battle Bay60
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne30
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1




4
3


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
Errors [Close]

#0 Stopped to cacheFillTable as currently in progress (1 sys_registry entries found) +0s ... 0.005s

#1 sys_registry tx_nbc2fe_gpusingle_1 entry uid:586099 from 2024.06.03 10:15 +0s ... 0.005s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 48433> for benchmark 201, setting:714 +0s ... 0.193s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 16301> for benchmark 201, setting:714 +0s ... 0.196s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4124> for benchmark 201, setting:1054 +0s ... 0.198s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2142> for benchmark 201, setting:1054 +0s ... 0.201s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4904> for benchmark 201, setting:1055 +0s ... 0.203s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2001> for benchmark 201, setting:1055 +0s ... 0.205s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4291> for benchmark 201, setting:1057 +0s ... 0.207s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1516> for benchmark 201, setting:1057 +0s ... 0.209s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4806> for benchmark 201, setting:1058 +0s ... 0.211s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1339> for benchmark 201, setting:1058 +0s ... 0.213s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 716> for benchmark 201, setting:2348 +0s ... 0.215s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 181> for benchmark 201, setting:2465 +0s ... 0.217s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 0.96> for benchmark 365, setting:2715 +0s ... 0.219s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 11> for benchmark 365, setting:1696 +0s ... 0.221s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3.7> for benchmark 365, setting:1696 +0s ... 0.222s

#17 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 31> for benchmark 365, setting:1690 +0s ... 0.224s

#18 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 11> for benchmark 365, setting:1690 +0s ... 0.226s

#19 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 29> for benchmark 365, setting:979 +0s ... 0.227s

#20 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8.8> for benchmark 365, setting:979 +0s ... 0.229s

#21 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 47> for benchmark 327, setting:884 +0s ... 0.231s

#22 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 15> for benchmark 327, setting:884 +0s ... 0.232s

#23 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 76> for benchmark 260, setting:743 +0s ... 0.234s

#24 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 26> for benchmark 260, setting:743 +0s ... 0.236s

#25 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 147> for benchmark 216, setting:640 +0s ... 0.237s

#26 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 42> for benchmark 216, setting:640 +0s ... 0.239s

#27 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 25274> for benchmark 833, setting:2453 +0s ... 0.241s

#28 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 15.81> for benchmark 731, setting:2211 +0s ... 0.242s

#29 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8985> for benchmark 200, setting:597 +0s ... 0.244s

#30 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 24108> for benchmark 200, setting:597 +0s ... 0.246s

#31 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4777> for benchmark 200, setting:598 +0s ... 0.248s

#32 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 16564> for benchmark 200, setting:598 +0s ... 0.25s

#33 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7.07> for benchmark 416, setting:2492 +0s ... 0.251s

log 03. 11:30:09

#0 checking url part for id 8770 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10459 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 will recreate cache as older than 5 days: 1717407009s = 19877.3959375d, id:gpuID:8770 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 table tx_nbc2_benchcache_gpu already found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 About to fill cache table +0s ... 0.005s

#6 composed specs +0.111s ... 0.116s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.116s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.116s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8770 +0.028s ... 0.144s

#10 got single benchmarks 8770 +0.012s ... 0.156s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10459 +0.001s ... 0.157s

#12 got single benchmarks 10459 +0.033s ... 0.19s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.19s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.193s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.196s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.198s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.201s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.203s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.205s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.207s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.209s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.211s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.213s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.215s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.217s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.219s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.221s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.222s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.224s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.226s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.227s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.229s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.231s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.232s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.234s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.236s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.237s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.239s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.241s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.242s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.244s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.246s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.248s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.25s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.251s

#46 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.251s

#47 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.252s

#48 Got 60 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.27s

#49 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.27s

#50 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.275s

#51 benchmarks composed for output. +0.026s ... 0.301s

#52 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.301s

#53 return log +0.044s ... 0.346s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)