Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-13700 vs Intel Core i5-13400F

Intel Core i7-13700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a fast and relatively economical desktop processor from the current Raptor Lake series. The processor was introduced in early 2023 and offers a base clock of 2.1 GHz. It reaches up to 5.2 GHz in Turbo mode. As with Alder Lake-S, Raptor Lake-S is also based on a hybrid design that combines P and E cores. Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the number of E-cores has been doubled to 8, meaning that the Intel Core i7-13700 offers up to 24 threads together with its 8 P-cores. The processor continues to be manufactured using the 10 nm production process called "Intel 7". There is no freely selectable multiplier for the Intel Core i7-13700 (compared to the faster i7-13700K) and the LGA 1700 socket introduced with the Alder Lake series continues to serve as the basis.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the IPC of the new Core i7-13700 has been increased slightly. At the same time, the 4 additional E-cores now provide slightly more performance for multi-threaded tasks. This puts the Intel Core i7-13700 at the level of an Intel Core i9-12900K, which also offers a total of 24 threads.

iGPU

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 however is only suitable for office use and very old or low demanding games.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-13700 is 65 watts in PL1. Intel defines the PL2 limit at 219 watts. If the restrictions regarding power consumption are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be reached permanently and even exceeded with good cooling. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

ModelIntel Core i7-13700Intel Core i5-13400F
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-S
CodenameRaptor Lake-SRaptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake-S
Intel Core i7-13700 « 2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-137002.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2100 - 5200 MHz2500 - 4600 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache30 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 24
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 4.1 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
10 / 16
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$384 U.S.$196 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.deark.intel.com
L1 Cache0.1 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700
49.5 pt (69%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 21013     avg: 25369     median: 25369 (24%)     max: 29725 Points
15911 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1997     avg: 2009     median: 2008.5 (85%)     max: 2020 Points
1744 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 703     avg: 740     median: 739.5 (82%)     max: 776 Points
672 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 7027     avg: 9194     median: 9194 (22%)     max: 11361 Points
6091 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2986     avg: 3692     median: 3692 (23%)     max: 4398 Points
2364 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 279     avg: 285     median: 285 (86%)     max: 291 Points
252 Points (76%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
50.4 Points (66%)
27.5 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.5 Points (87%)
3.1 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10840 Points (65%)
8689 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
82724 Points (60%)
51113 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
125536 Points (87%)
82988 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
16324 Points (20%)
13947 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
161.5 s (2%)
367.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.5 s (1%)
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
12289 Points (19%)
8602 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 74475     avg: 91604     median: 91604 (53%)     max: 108733 MIPS
60048 MIPS (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6466     avg: 6643     median: 6642.5 (79%)     max: 6819 MIPS
5743 MIPS (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
224 fps (78%)
136.9 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
393 fps (91%)
314.5 fps (73%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 21.4     avg: 27.3     median: 27.3 (48%)     max: 33.1 fps
19.2 fps (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.1 GB/s (0%)
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.8 GB/s (66%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
22 GB/s (57%)
12.2 GB/s (32%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 181     avg: 250.5     median: 250.5 (3%)     max: 320 Seconds
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 111     avg: 144.5     median: 144.5 (1%)     max: 178 Seconds
206 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4075     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.423 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17194 Points (37%)
13989 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.4 s (1%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.9 s (1%)
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
329.2 s (1%)
420.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
82438 Points (72%)
77937 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23197     avg: 26874     median: 26874 (73%)     max: 30551 Points
23820 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
96793 Points (79%)
77765 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
96083 Points (78%)
76636 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
97199 Points (82%)
80273 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
26999 Points (68%)
19846 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 31032     avg: 37512     median: 37512 (67%)     max: 43992 Points
28087 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14079     avg: 16213     median: 16212.5 (68%)     max: 18346 Points
12669 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2761 Points (84%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
15882 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1958     avg: 1984     median: 1983.5 (84%)     max: 2009 Points
1792 Points (76%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15525     avg: 17564     median: 17563.5 (31%)     max: 19602 Points
12095 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1925 Points (8%)
1721 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18964 Points (60%)
12009 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8714 Points (87%)
7684 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
67866 Points (76%)
43856 Points (49%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 468     avg: 470     median: 470 (1%)     max: 472 ms
535 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 289     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (83%)     max: 290 Points
254 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 332     avg: 338     median: 338 (70%)     max: 344 Points
294 Points (61%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2017     avg: 2169     median: 2168.5 (83%)     max: 2320 Points
1941 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 109.8     avg: 247.9     median: 247.9 (43%)     max: 386 Watt
214 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 149.6     avg: 257.3     median: 257.3 (47%)     max: 365 Watt
184.2 Watt (34%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.49     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (30%)     max: 83.7 Watt
76.3 Watt (50%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
20 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700 → 100% n=48

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 80% n=48

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 09. 15:04:27

#0 checking url part for id 14997 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:39:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14997 +0.018s ... 0.041s

#7 got single benchmarks 14997 +0.013s ... 0.055s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.017s ... 0.072s

#9 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.009s ... 0.081s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.081s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.353s ... 0.434s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.461s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)