Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-13700 vs Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Core i7-13700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a fast and relatively economical desktop processor from the current Raptor Lake series. The processor was introduced in early 2023 and offers a base clock of 2.1 GHz. It reaches up to 5.2 GHz in Turbo mode. As with Alder Lake-S, Raptor Lake-S is also based on a hybrid design that combines P and E cores. Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the number of E-cores has been doubled to 8, meaning that the Intel Core i7-13700 offers up to 24 threads together with its 8 P-cores. The processor continues to be manufactured using the 10 nm production process called "Intel 7". There is no freely selectable multiplier for the Intel Core i7-13700 (compared to the faster i7-13700K) and the LGA 1700 socket introduced with the Alder Lake series continues to serve as the basis.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the IPC of the new Core i7-13700 has been increased slightly. At the same time, the 4 additional E-cores now provide slightly more performance for multi-threaded tasks. This puts the Intel Core i7-13700 at the level of an Intel Core i9-12900K, which also offers a total of 24 threads.

iGPU

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 however is only suitable for office use and very old or low demanding games.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-13700 is 65 watts in PL1. Intel defines the PL2 limit at 219 watts. If the restrictions regarding power consumption are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be reached permanently and even exceeded with good cooling. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

Intel Celeron N4000

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4000

The Intel Celeron N4000 is a dual-core SoC designed for affordable laptops and mini-PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1 GHz to 2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst maxes out at 2.5 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features a larger L2 cache (4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4000 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4300Y, a fairly old dual-core processor of nearly the same energy efficiency, in multi-thread performance. In other words, the Celeron is a very slow processor that's good enough for the most basic of tasks only. Expect long load times no matter the app.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 650 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other N-class Intel chips, the Celeron N4000 has a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is not much at all, allowing laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs around the chip. The SoC can briefly consume up to 15 W, though, depending on how a system is configured.

Last but not the least, this Celeron is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-13700Intel Celeron N4000
CodenameRaptor Lake-SGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Core i7-13700 « 2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 compare1.5 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2100 - 5200 MHz1100 - 2600 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB4 MB
L3 Cache30 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 24
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 4.1 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
2 / 2
TDP65 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1090
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2DDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$384 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.deark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700
42.8 pt (71%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4000
14.7 pt (24%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 21013     avg: 25369     median: 25369 (24%)     max: 29725 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1997     avg: 2009     median: 2008.5 (84%)     max: 2020 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 703     avg: 740     median: 739.5 (81%)     max: 776 Points
160 Points (17%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 7027     avg: 9194     median: 9194 (22%)     max: 11361 Points
273 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2986     avg: 3692     median: 3692 (23%)     max: 4398 Points
min: 121     avg: 132.7     median: 138 (1%)     max: 139 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 279     avg: 285     median: 285 (79%)     max: 291 Points
min: 65     avg: 70.3     median: 70.9 (20%)     max: 75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
50.4 Points (65%)
1.7 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.5 Points (83%)
0.9 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10840 Points (65%)
2152 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
82724 Points (60%)
4030 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
125536 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
16324 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
161.5 s (2%)
1007 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.5 s (1%)
31.9 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
12289 Points (19%)
760 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 74475     avg: 91604     median: 91604 (53%)     max: 108733 MIPS
4114 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6466     avg: 6643     median: 6642.5 (78%)     max: 6819 MIPS
2298 MIPS (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
224 fps (6%)
9.5 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
393 fps (10%)
47.3 fps (1%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 21.4     avg: 27.3     median: 27.3 (48%)     max: 33.1 fps
0.8 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.1 GB/s (62%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.8 GB/s (66%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
22 GB/s (57%)
0.9 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 181     avg: 250.5     median: 250.5 (3%)     max: 320 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 111     avg: 144.5     median: 144.5 (1%)     max: 178 Seconds
4736 Seconds (33%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4075     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.423 sec
1.7 sec (36%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17194 Points (37%)
2259 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.4 s (1%)
25.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.9 s (1%)
57.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
329.2 s (1%)
1295 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
82438 Points (63%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23197     avg: 26874     median: 26874 (66%)     max: 30551 Points
min: 1638     avg: 1713     median: 1712.5 (4%)     max: 1787 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
96793 Points (79%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
96083 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
97199 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
26999 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 31032     avg: 37512     median: 37512 (67%)     max: 43992 Points
1974 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14079     avg: 16213     median: 16212.5 (68%)     max: 18346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1389 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2761 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
15882 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1958     avg: 1984     median: 1983.5 (75%)     max: 2009 Points
min: 431     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (16%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15525     avg: 17564     median: 17563.5 (31%)     max: 19602 Points
min: 797     avg: 802     median: 801.5 (1%)     max: 806 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1925 Points (8%)
434 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18964 Points (60%)
791 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8714 Points (87%)
1862 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
67866 Points (67%)
3219 Points (3%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 468     avg: 470     median: 470 (1%)     max: 472 ms
min: 2306     avg: 2382     median: 2381.5 (3%)     max: 2457 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
446.5 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
15679 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 289     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (80%)     max: 290 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 332     avg: 338     median: 338 (61%)     max: 344 Points
min: 71.2     avg: 78.6     median: 78.6 (14%)     max: 86 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6152 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22786 Points (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7604 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10205 Points (51%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2017     avg: 2169     median: 2168.5 (81%)     max: 2320 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 109.8     avg: 247.9     median: 247.9 (43%)     max: 386 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 149.6     avg: 257.3     median: 257.3 (47%)     max: 365 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.49     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (30%)     max: 83.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
20 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700 → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4000 → 13% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 13. 12:53:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14997 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9426 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760352795s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14997 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14997 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9426 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 9426 +0.012s ... 0.03s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.07s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)