Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-7440HQ vs Intel Core i5-7267U

Intel Core i5-7440HQ

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7440HQ

The Intel Core i5-7440HQ is a quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. Compared to the faster Core i7 models, the Core i5 does not support Hyper Threading and has lower clocks. The CPU cores run at 2.8 - 3.8 GHz (4 cores up to 3.4, 2 cores up to 3.6 GHz). The processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Due to the higher clock speeds, the performance of the i5-7440HQ is clearly faster than the old Core i5-6440HQ with 2.6 - 3.5 GHz. The performance is therefore sufficient even for demanding tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1000 MHz (i7 models up to 1100). The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

Intel Core i5-7267U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-7267U is a fast dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 3.1-3.5 GHz (two cores also up to 3.5 GHz). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU with 64 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the 28-Watt CPU should be on par with the Core i7-7500U (2.7-3.5 GHz, no eDRAM, 15 Watts), but it should be a bit slower on practice due to the missing level 4 eDRAM and the lower TDP. This means the i5 is still one of the faster dual-core processors and should be sufficient for most scenarios. Some games might still require a real quad-core processor and therefore nit run perfectly on the dual-core processor, despite Hyper Threading.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 650 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 550, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for dual-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelIntel Core i5-7440HQIntel Core i5-7267U
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameKaby LakeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
» Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7130U compare2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
» Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7130U compare2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock2800 - 3800 MHz3100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 4
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1000 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$250 U.S.$304 U.S.
Announced
SocketBGA1356
ManufacturerIntel Kaby Lake i5-7267U

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
554 Points (6%)
383 Points (4%)
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
158 Points (54%)
141 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4.1 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.5 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5010 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
11403 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
318.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.2 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3243 Points (19%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
36 fps (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
182 fps (49%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4378 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.9 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
524 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6583 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
52071 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
51726 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
44493 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
5243 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
7343 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2044 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3972     avg: 4182     median: 4181.5 (48%)     max: 4391 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8084     avg: 8706     median: 8706 (11%)     max: 9328 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
820 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
110.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
38960 Points (40%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
42.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.5 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
13 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7440HQ → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7267U → 83% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 28. 13:48:26

#0 checking url part for id 8416 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8454 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#49 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#50 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#51 getting avg benchmarks for device 8416 +0s ... 0.011s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.013s

#54 got single benchmarks 8416 +0.008s ... 0.021s

#55 getting avg benchmarks for device 8454 +0s ... 0.021s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#58 got single benchmarks 8454 +0.007s ... 0.029s

#59 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.037s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#106 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.05s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#108 return log +0.004s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)