Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400 vs Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Core i5-13400

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a top modern and fast desktop processor and belongs to the current Raptor Lake series. The processor was introduced early 2023 and offers a base clock of 2.5 GHz. It reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo mode. As with Alder Lake-S, Raptor Lake-S is also based on a hybrid design that combines P and E cores. The Intel Core i5-13400 therefore offers 6 P-cores and 4 E-cores, which can process a total of up to 16 threads in parallel. The processor continues to be manufactured using the 10 nm production process (called "Intel 7"). The Intel Core i5-13400 does not have a freely selectable multiplier. The LGA 1700 socket introduced with the Alder Lake series serves as the basis. The Intel Core i5-13400 can be based on either a Raptor Lake or Alder Lake chip. Initially, however, Alder Lake chips will be supplied.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-12400, the IPC of the new Core i5-13400 has been increased slightly. Nevertheless, there are now also 4 e-cores, which support the processor in terms of multi-thread performance. This puts the Intel Core i5-13400 at the level of an Intel Core i5-12600K, which also offers a total of 16 threads.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit, but it is only suited for office use or very old and low demanding games.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13400 is 65 watts in PL1. Intel defines the PL2 limit at 148 watts. If the restrictions regarding power consumption are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be reached permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400Intel Core i7-12700
CodenameRaptor Lake-SAlder Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Alder Lake-S
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB1 MB
L2 Cache9.5 MB12 MB
L3 Cache20 MB25 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1612 / 20
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$221 U.S.$349 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.dewww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400
38.4 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
41.2 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15953 Points (15%)
21751 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1786 Points (75%)
1894 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
688 Points (75%)
731 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6135 Points (15%)
8338 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2358 Points (15%)
3151 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
257 Points (71%)
272 Points (75%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.4 Points (35%)
36.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (74%)
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8721 Points (53%)
9171 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51095 Points (37%)
60892 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
83214 Points (53%)
103354 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14142 Points (17%)
15091 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
452.3 s (5%)
272.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.5 s (1%)
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7979 Points (13%)
9328 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
59510 MIPS (34%)
78331 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5829 MIPS (69%)
6292 MIPS (74%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
135.8 fps (45%)
172.4 fps (58%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
311 fps (72%)
347 fps (80%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.1 fps (34%)
25.5 fps (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.8 GB/s (31%)
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
242 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
151 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13632 Points (29%)
15390 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18 s (1%)
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
427.2 s (2%)
400.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79573 Points (61%)
72464 Points (56%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23120 Points (57%)
27022 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
83302 Points (68%)
86815 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82671 Points (67%)
86587 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
89999 Points (75%)
96264 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19608 Points (50%)
23193 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27135 Points (48%)
34681 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12948 Points (55%)
16400 Points (69%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1795 Points (70%)
1924 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
12107 Points (22%)
14961 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1706 Points (7%)
1845 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11801 Points (37%)
14883 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7683 Points (77%)
8059 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
42509 Points (42%)
52676 Points (53%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
508 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
251 Points (69%)
268 Points (74%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
306 Points (55%)
314 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1877 Points (70%)
2016 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
229 Watt (39%)
327 Watt (56%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
196.6 Watt (36%)
284 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
82.8 Watt (92%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400 → 100% n=48

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 118% n=48

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 22:05:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14996 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753819519s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14996 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14996 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.005s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 14995 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.044s ... 0.068s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)