Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i3-N300

Intel Core i5-12400F

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a fast six-core processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in January 2022. The processor has a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and reaches a maximum clock speed of up to 4.4 GHz under load. As with its predecessor, the Intel Core i5-11400F, Alder-Lake also supports hyperthreading, which means that up to 12 threads can be processed simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-12400F is manufactured using the 10 nm process. There are many changes to the new architecture, which is essentially based on a hybrid architecture. However, the Intel Core i5-12400F does not fully benefit from this, as only P-cores are used under the heatspreader. Only with the faster Intel Core i5-12600K can you enjoy the performance of the combination of P and E cores. The Intel Core i5-12400F is a non-K CPU, which in turn means that there is no freely selectable multiplier, which means that the CPU is not suitable for overclocking.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-11400F , the IPC of the Intel Core i5-12400F has been significantly increased again. The performance difference between the two processors is between 10 and 20 percent in most cases. Due to the good single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-12400F is definitely a sensible CPU to use as the basis in a gaming PC.

Graphics unit

The processors marked with an "F" in the nomenclature do not offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can rely on the Intel Iris Xe.

Power consumption

The TDP is relatively low at 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-12400F with PL2 offers a higher TDP of up to 117 watts. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, there is no time limit for the PL2 value. With the maximum 117 watts, a large cooling unit is not required.

Intel Core i3-N300

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N300

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz (single core, 3 GHz all core Turbo). The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance depends on the cooling and TDP settings and should be somewhere similar to the old  Alder Lake Pentium 8500 (1 performance core, 4 efficiency cores, max. 4.4 GHz and 8 MB L3-cache). The multi-threaded performance should be quite good with the 8 cores but will suffer due to the low TDP. Single thread performance will suffer due to the missing P-cores and relatively low boost clock speeds.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 7 W and is therefore even suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i5-12400FIntel Core i3-N300
CodenameAlder Lake-SAlder Lake-N
Series Alder Lake-SIntel Alder Lake-N
Clock2500 - 4400 MHz <=3800 MHz
L1 Cache480 KB
L2 Cache7.5 MB
L3 Cache17.9 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP65 Watt7 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size163 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
Socket1700
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
$180 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.deark.intel.com
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 « - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12400F
36.2 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N300
19 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
34 Points (17%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
165 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12380 Points (11%)
2546 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1680 Points (68%)
513 Points (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
653 Points (71%)
195 Points (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4740 Points (12%)
968 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1759 Points (11%)
416 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
244 Points (68%)
85 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
20.4 Points (26%)
5.3 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (70%)
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8389 Points (51%)
2884 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40690 Points (29%)
12014 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
69819 Points (45%)
18450 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13664 Points (17%)
4497 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
112.8 s (1%)
531 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.1 s (1%)
17.5 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7816 Points (12%)
1915 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
45043 MIPS (26%)
11976 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5476 MIPS (65%)
2403 MIPS (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
101.4 fps (3%)
28.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
252.5 fps (6%)
106.6 fps (3%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
15.2 fps (27%)
3.2 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (26%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.3 GB/s (24%)
2.6 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
430 Seconds (5%)
2147 Seconds (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
269 Seconds (2%)
1095 Seconds (8%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
1.3 sec (29%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11892 Points (25%)
4261 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
33.2 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.5 s (1%)
69.1 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
438.4 s (2%)
1381 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
63413 Points (49%)
15263 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
19436 Points (48%)
4983 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81984 Points (67%)
28114 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82024 Points (67%)
28073 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 i3-N300 +
28903 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15317 Points (39%)
4049 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
24023 Points (43%)
5528 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9745 Points (41%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2329 Points (54%)
762 Points (18%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
9737 Points (38%)
2803 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
734 Points (23%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2641 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1742 Points (59%)
626 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9517 Points (17%)
2674 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1673 Points (7%)
616 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
9368 Points (30%)
2642 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7548 Points (75%)
2913 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
35098 Points (34%)
9894 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
573 ms (1%)
1638 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
235 Points (61%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
272 Points (49%)
104.3 Points (19%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1762 Points (66%)
529 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
239 Watt (41%)
980%
1 i3-N300 +
24.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
194.4 Watt (35%)
876%
1 i3-N300 +
22.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83.6 Watt (55%)
569%
1 i3-N300 +
14.7 Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12400F → 100% n=47

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N300 → 30% n=47

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 31. 00:58:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14994 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14928 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761868709s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14994 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 14994 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14928 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 14928 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.068s

#13 return log +0.019s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)