Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10400F vs Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-6700K

► remove from comparison Intel 6700K

The Intel Core i7-6700K is a high-end quad-core desktop processor based on the Skylake architecture, which was announced in August 2015. The CPU, which is manufactured in a 14 nm process, runs at 4.0 up to 4.2 GHz (2 cores: 4.0 GHz, 3 cores: 4.0 GHz, 4 cores: 4.0 GHz) and can execute up to 8 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyperthreading. Being a so called "K"-model, the Core i7-6700K has a free multiplier and can be easily overclocked. 

Performance

Even though the Core i7-6700K has a slightly lower clock than the old i7-4790K (4.0 GHz - 4.4 GHz), the performance is slightly better compared to the Haswell predecessor. Depending on the application, the per-MHz performance was increased by roughly 5-10 %. Even the most demanding applications and games are no problem for the high-end CPU.

Graphics

Graphics are handled by the integrated Intel HD Graphics 530 with 24 EUs (Execution Units), which is clocked at 350 - 1150 MHz. Compared to the HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell, 20 EUs), the performance is increased by around 25 percent. The overall GPU performance is still low-end, so modern games can, if at all, only be played smoothly with low settings. 

Power Consumption

The TDP was slightly raised from 88 to 91 Watts compared to the predecessor.

ModelIntel Core i5-10400FIntel Core i7-6700K
CodenameComet LakeSkylake
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Core i7 (Desktop)
Series: Core i7 (Desktop) Skylake
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700K « 4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700 compare3.4 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700T compare2.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4300 MHz4000 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache12 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP65 Watt91 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA1200FCLGA1151
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
Architecturex86x86
$155 U.S.$339 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 530 (350 - 1150 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
30.3 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
438 Points (48%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3201 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1332 Points (8%)
min: 865     avg: 881     median: 880 (6%)     max: 910 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
180 Points (50%)
min: 160     avg: 174.4     median: 177.5 (49%)     max: 182 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.4 Points (19%)
min: 8.55     avg: 9.6     median: 9.7 (12%)     max: 10.2 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (48%)
min: 1.72     avg: 2     median: 2 (47%)     max: 2.16 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6719 Points (41%)
min: 6434     avg: 6980     median: 6531 (39%)     max: 8845 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36564 Points (26%)
min: 19705     avg: 24305     median: 25817 (19%)     max: 26150 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (31%)
min: 33740     avg: 34944     median: 34593 (22%)     max: 36500 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8849 Points (11%)
min: 8600     avg: 8758     median: 8624 (11%)     max: 9050 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
134.7 s (2%)
min: 178     avg: 225.4     median: 205.9 (2%)     max: 275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
min: 5.726     avg: 7.2     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 8.94 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 6700K +
5877 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
36731 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5064 MIPS (60%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.2 fps (2%)
min: 52.5     avg: 54.4     median: 54.6 (1%)     max: 55.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
228.5 fps (6%)
min: 194.2     avg: 204.7     median: 204.8 (5%)     max: 210.2 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.2 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 6700K +
min: 0.203     avg: 0.4     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.507 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 6700K +
min: 0.324     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.848 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 6700K +
min: 1.7     avg: 3.8     median: 4.4 (11%)     max: 4.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
332.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 6700K +
min: 8973     avg: 9037     median: 9037 (19%)     max: 9101 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
min: 8.787     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 9.392 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.2 s (1%)
min: 19.7     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (1%)     max: 20.83 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
470.4 s (2%)
min: 463.8     avg: 479     median: 479.7 (2%)     max: 498.3 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 6700K +
min: 31997     avg: 32843     median: 32153 (25%)     max: 34379 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14539 Points (36%)
min: 10341     avg: 11161     median: 11228 (28%)     max: 11761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
62086 Points (50%)
min: 59904     avg: 61163     median: 61287.5 (50%)     max: 62149 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (50%)
min: 59247     avg: 60685     median: 61091 (50%)     max: 62096 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (50%)
min: 60945     avg: 61859     median: 62114 (50%)     max: 62262 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11914 Points (30%)
min: 8328     avg: 9165     median: 9272 (23%)     max: 9702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 6700K +
min: 12430     avg: 12822     median: 12870.5 (23%)     max: 13182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7548 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1489 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
6726 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (46%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700K +
16365 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700K +
4225 Points (55%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700K +
min: 17030     avg: 17122     median: 17122 (27%)     max: 17214 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700K +
min: 4436     avg: 4598     median: 4598 (69%)     max: 4760 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
min: 795     avg: 800     median: 800 (1%)     max: 805 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 76.8     avg: 119.5     median: 119.5 (1%)     max: 162.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 6700K +
min: 37135     avg: 40412     median: 40411.5 (30%)     max: 43688 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
215 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
135.8 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
125.5 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-6700K → 87% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 04. 09:59:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6949 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759564776s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6949 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 6949 +0.014s ... 0.028s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.061s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)