Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 685

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 685

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 600 Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 06.12.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIDirectX 12
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 685GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Microsoft SQ18 x 3000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
3589 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
31.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
167.7 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 36% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 685
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact59.559.358.2
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile4439.532
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 685
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1

2


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 12. 01:44:51

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760226291s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:19:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.014s ... 0.041s

#9 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.006s ... 0.047s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0s ... 0.047s

#11 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.003s ... 0.051s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.054s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.054s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.054s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.055s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.061s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.061s

#19 Got 14 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.065s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.065s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.065s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.067s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.067s

#24 return log +0s ... 0.067s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)