Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra X9 388H

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is a fast high-end 16-core SoC of the Panther Lake family and top model with 12 Xe3 GPU cores. Furthermore, the SoC includes 18 MB Cache and support for vPro managment features (vPro eligibility).

The 388H integrates a compute tile manufactured by Intel in the new 18A (1.8nm) process with 4 large Cougar Cove P-cores clocked at up to 5.1 GHz, 8 Darkmont E-cores and another 4 Darkmont LP (low power) E-cores. Furthermore, the new NPU 5 with 50 TOPS INT 8 and an IPU 7.5 image processor are included.

The GPU tile contains a big and fast iGPU with 12 Xe3 cores and ray tracing support clocked at up to 2.5 GHz that can rival entry level dedicated GPUs.

The third chiplet integrates the platform controller with 12 PCIe lanes, 4x Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 7 (R2) and Bluetooth Core 6.0. GPU and platform controller are manufactured by TSMC.

The power consumption is specified from 15 W (minimum assured power) over 25 Watt (processor base power PL1) up to 80 W (maximum Turbo power).

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 356H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is a high-end 16-core SoC from the Panther Lake family for laptops. The chip also offers 18 MB cache and only the smaller 4-core iGPU.

The 356H integrates a compute tile that is manufactured by Intel in the new 18A process. This includes 4 large Cougar Cove P-Cores with up to 1.9 - 4.7 GHz, 8 Darkmont E-Cores with 1.5 - 3.7 GHz and another 4 small Darkmont LP (Low Power) E-Cores with 1.5 - 3.3 GHz. Furthermore, the new NPU 5 with 50 TOPS INT 8 and an IPU 7.5 image processor are installed. The integrated memory controller supports up to 96 GB LPDDR5-9600 or 128 GB DDR5-7200.

The GPU tile contains a smaller iGPU with 4 Xe3 cores and ray tracing support.

The third chiplet integrates the platform controller with 20 PCIe lanes (compared to 12 lanes of the other two Panther Lake chips), 4x Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 7 (R2) and Bluetooth Core 6.0. The platform controller is also manufactured by TSMC.

The power consumption is specified from 15 W (minimum assured power) over 25 Watt (processor base power PL1) up to 80 W (maximum Turbo power).

ModelIntel Core Ultra X9 388HIntel Core Ultra 7 356H
CodenamePanther LakePanther Lake
SeriesIntel Panther LakeIntel Panther Lake
Series: Panther Lake Panther Lake
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H « 1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H compare1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H compare1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H compare1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 355 compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 365 compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 335 compare1.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 325 compare1.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 322 compare1.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Intel Core Ultra 5 332 compare1.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H compare1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H compare1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H compare1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H « 1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 355 compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 365 compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 335 compare1.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 325 compare1.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 322 compare1.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Intel Core Ultra 5 332 compare1.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Clock1600 - 5100 MHz1500 - 4700 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
4 x 5.1 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
8 x 4.0 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core
16 / 16
4 x 4.7 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
4 x 3.3 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt80 Watt
Technology1.8 nm1.8 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA2540FCBGA2540
iGPUIntel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2450 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI180 TOPS INT8180 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra X9 388H
43.9 pt (73%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 356H
42.7 pt (71%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
129.8 Points (65%)
122.4 Points (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 794     avg: 1021     median: 1043 (19%)     max: 1172 Points
1232 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20159 Points (19%)
20650 Points (19%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2188 Points (89%)
2045 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
834 Points (91%)
773 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7864 Points (19%)
8074 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3198 Points (20%)
3201 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
306 Points (85%)
306 Points (85%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
39.3 Points (51%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (86%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10814 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
72385 Points (52%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
339.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.1 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16460 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
68350 MIPS (39%)
69785 MIPS (40%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6655 MIPS (78%)
6305 MIPS (74%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
23.7 fps (42%)
25.1 fps (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.4 GB/s (41%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.2 GB/s (34%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
282 Seconds (4%)
261 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
170 Seconds (1%)
163 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
0.4 sec (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
376.8 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23185 Points (57%)
21909 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
33013 Points (59%)
29088 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
15213 Points (64%)
9074 Points (38%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 3020     avg: 3043     median: 3043 (70%)     max: 3066 Points
min: 2532     avg: 2692     median: 2691.5 (62%)     max: 2851 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 17694     avg: 17809     median: 17809 (61%)     max: 17924 Points
min: 15578     avg: 16127     median: 16127 (55%)     max: 16676 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2191 Points (74%)
2086 Points (70%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
17350 Points (31%)
16761 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
430 ms (1%)
463 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
110858 Points (72%)
121064 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
314 Points (78%)
292 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
339 Points (57%)
304 Points (51%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2155 Points (75%)
1905 Points (67%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
77.6 Watt (13%)
97.8 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
88.2 Watt (16%)
99.6 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6 Watt (4%)
min: 7.4     avg: 48.7     median: 48.7 (32%)     max: 90 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.8 Watt (5%)
5.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
36.3 Points per Watt (27%)
32.1 Points per Watt (24%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H → 100% n=26

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H → 96% n=26

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 15. 10:09:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 20016 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 20440 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1773565781s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:10:45 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 20016 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 20016 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 20440 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 20440 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.054s

#13 return log +0.124s ... 0.177s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)