The Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 was a uppder middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9500 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt).
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9400 offers enough performance for most demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9400 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is a bit limited, but should be sufficient for everyday tasks.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 is an entry level laptop processor based on the Penryn core. It offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6600, the T6670 offers Virtualization VT-x and a higher maximum temperature of 105°C.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 → NAN%n=
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 → NAN%n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 06. 10:54:24
#0 checking url part for id 393 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 04 Dec 2022 10:20:04 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 393 +0.002s ... 0.027s
#8 got single benchmarks 393 +0.071s ... 0.098s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0.002s ... 0.1s
#10 got single benchmarks 473 +0.007s ... 0.107s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0.002s ... 0.109s
#12 got single benchmarks 467 +0.014s ... 0.123s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.123s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.06s ... 0.183s