Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7100

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7100

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 was a entry level to mid-range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuringonly half of the 4 MB level 2 cache.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1800 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm1.075V-1.175V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitSpeedStep, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
$197 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1999     avg: 2062     median: 2072.5 (19%)     max: 2093 Points
1817 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3729     avg: 3771     median: 3762.5 (5%)     max: 3822 Points
3419 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7250 +
45 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1608     avg: 1678     median: 1705 (4%)     max: 1751 Points
min: 1358     avg: 1500     median: 1535.5 (3%)     max: 1550 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (6%)     max: 32 s
31 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (3%)     max: 74 s
71 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 s
1614 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
min: 16039     avg: 16240     median: 16239.5 (8%)     max: 16440 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
min: 11409     avg: 11484     median: 11483.5 (9%)     max: 11558 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3715     avg: 4317     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
min: 3068     avg: 3956     median: 4040 (25%)     max: 4660 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7250 +
4.9 Points (70%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 → 94% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 26. 01:02:39

#0 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 325 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0s ... 0.005s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#41 got single benchmarks 340 +0.021s ... 0.027s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 325 +0s ... 0.027s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.028s

#44 got single benchmarks 325 +0.024s ... 0.052s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#99 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.059s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#101 return log +0.004s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)