Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.

Intel Core 2 Duo L7300

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5900Intel Core 2 Duo L7300Intel Core 2 Duo T7400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz1400 MHz2160 MHz
FSB800800667
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt34 Watt
65 nm65 nm65 nm1.0375-1.3V
SocketSocket PPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
$286 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7400

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (19%)     max: 2130 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (5%)     max: 4100 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 1633     avg: 1817     median: 1861 (4%)     max: 1895 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7400 +
257 Points (99%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5900 +
26 s (6%)
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 23     avg: 24     median: 24 (5%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T5900 +
65 s (3%)
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 58     avg: 59.3     median: 58 (2%)     max: 62 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 1523     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (7%)     max: 1539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5900 +
18700 MIPS (9%)
98%
1 T7400 +
min: 13249     avg: 18264     median: 18263.5 (9%)     max: 23278 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5900 +
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
91%
1 T7400 +
min: 9696     avg: 12732     median: 12732 (10%)     max: 15768 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7400 +
683 Points (47%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7400 +
2230 Points (92%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7400 +
2080 Points (94%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 7174     avg: 7329     median: 7376 (99%)     max: 7438 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T5900 +
4639 Points (29%)
101%
1 T7400 +
min: 3716     avg: 4445     median: 4683 (29%)     max: 4859 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 11. 01:47:14

#0 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 344 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#61 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#62 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#63 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0s ... 0.007s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#65 got single benchmarks 439 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#66 getting avg benchmarks for device 344 +0s ... 0.016s

#67 got single benchmarks 344 +0s ... 0.016s

#68 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0s ... 0.016s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.017s

#70 got single benchmarks 164 +0.019s ... 0.036s

#71 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.038s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.045s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#107 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.045s

#108 return log +0s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)