Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo L7300

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.

Intel Core 2 Duo L7300

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5900Intel Core 2 Duo L7300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz1400 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm
SocketSocket P
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (19%)     max: 2130 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (5%)     max: 4100 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5900 +
26 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T5900 +
65 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5900 +
18700 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5900 +
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T5900 +
4639 Points (29%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 03:50:10

#0 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 344 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 got single benchmarks 439 +0.006s ... 0.013s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 344 +0s ... 0.013s

#43 got single benchmarks 344 +0s ... 0.013s

#44 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#55 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.016s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#57 return log +0.003s ... 0.019s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)