Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5870Intel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2000 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C85 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5870Intel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
SocketPPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1875     avg: 2092     median: 2088.5 (17%)     max: 2316 Points
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (16%)     max: 2013 Points
min: 1999     avg: 2062     median: 2072.5 (17%)     max: 2093 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3480     avg: 3855     median: 3809.5 (4%)     max: 4319 Points
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (4%)     max: 3835 Points
min: 3729     avg: 3771     median: 3762.5 (4%)     max: 3822 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 1355     avg: 1916     median: 1915.5 (23%)     max: 2476 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 42.47     avg: 60     median: 60 (12%)     max: 77.6 s
103%
1 T7250 +
45 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1560     avg: 1606     median: 1628 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
min: 1608     avg: 1678     median: 1705 (4%)     max: 1751 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 26.78     avg: 27.4     median: 27 (6%)     max: 28.27 s
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (6%)     max: 32 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.8     avg: 63.9     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 66 s
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1492 s (7%)
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
16620 MIPS (8%)
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3903     avg: 3926     median: 3925.5 (25%)     max: 3948 Points
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
min: 3715     avg: 4317     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
100%
1 T7250 +
4.9 Points (70%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T5870 +
4.9 Points (63%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 99% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 103% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 28. 12:57:35

#0 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#26 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#27 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0s ... 0.008s

#29 got single benchmarks 442 +0.01s ... 0.018s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#31 got single benchmarks 438 +0.02s ... 0.039s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0s ... 0.039s

#33 got single benchmarks 340 +0.023s ... 0.062s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.063s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.07s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#69 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.075s

#70 return log +0s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)