Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 855

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 2.84 GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. The higher ‘Prime Core’ clock speed should provide significantly better single core performance than the Snapdragon 845, but we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall short of the Apple A12 Bionic. The new SoC should have up to 45% faster single-core performance and 35% multi-core performance than its predecessor. Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s ability to maintain its performance when faced with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980.

The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE Cat.20 and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too.

Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to 802.11 ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds.

The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit (NPU) with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC.

The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption.

The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM (4 x 16-bit). Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, while Qualcomm claims that it should be 20% faster than its predecessor. We currently do not know what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will operate at as Qualcomm did not announce these during the announcement of the Snapdragon 855.

Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855 at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) using a 7 nm FinFET process. The switch to 7 nm manufacturing should make the SD855 20% more efficient than the SD845. Qualcomm has not officially announced the thermal design power (TDP) of the SD855, but we suspect that the SoC will reach a maximum of 5 W and will average around 3.5 W under load.

HiSilicon Kirin 990

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 990

The HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 30 Pro in late 2019. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.86 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 2.09 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.86 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a neural processor (1 + 1 cores) for AI tasks and a ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GPU clcoked at up to 600 MHz. Compared to the 5G version, the 4G Kirin 990 integrates a fast 4G modem and is slightly lower clocked (2 of the 3 clusters and the GPU).

The Kirin 990 is produced in the modern 7nm process at TSMC.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 855HiSilicon Kirin 990
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonHiSilicon
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 compare - 2.96 GHz8 / 8 cores5 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus compare - 2.96 GHz8 / 8 cores5 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 « 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores5 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 « - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e compare1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock2840 MHz <=2860 MHz
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache5 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
TDP5 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm
FeaturesX24 LTE Modem, Adreno 640 GPUARM Mali-G76MP16 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (2.36) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.95 GHz, big.LITTLE), 4G Modem
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 640 ( - 585 MHz)ARM Mali-G76 MP16 ( - 600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com
Transistors8000 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855
1 pt (73%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 990
min: 1.067     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (82%)     max: 1.3 pt
min: 19565     avg: 31512     median: 31512 (27%)     max: 43459 Points
min: 4756     avg: 5166     median: 5166 (61%)     max: 5576 Points
min: 4702     avg: 4918     median: 4917.5 (56%)     max: 5133 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 855 +
1008 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 855 +
2757 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 552     avg: 717     median: 744 (31%)     max: 751 Points
min: 759     avg: 770     median: 770 (32%)     max: 781 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2164     avg: 2572     median: 2666 (5%)     max: 2856 Points
min: 2893     avg: 2978     median: 2977.5 (5%)     max: 3062 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 725     avg: 742     median: 742 (3%)     max: 750 Points
783 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2441     avg: 2616     median: 2589.5 (8%)     max: 2852 Points
3059 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3406     avg: 3480     median: 3491 (35%)     max: 3537 Points
min: 3865     avg: 3882     median: 3881.5 (39%)     max: 3898 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10187     avg: 10955     median: 10987.5 (12%)     max: 11388 Points
min: 11885     avg: 12083     median: 12082.5 (13%)     max: 12280 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3295     avg: 3548     median: 3548 (48%)     max: 3801 Points
3910 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10163     avg: 10529     median: 10529 (26%)     max: 10895 Points
11615 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 855 +
9555 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 855 +
2891 Points (56%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
10281 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
3272 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1658     avg: 1926     median: 1926 (16%)     max: 2194 Points
3891 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 3919     avg: 4247     median: 4247 (39%)     max: 4575 Points
5595 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11986     avg: 14903     median: 14902.5 (29%)     max: 17819 Points
19729 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5470     avg: 6620     median: 6619.5 (13%)     max: 7769 Points
9053 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 7059     avg: 8575     median: 8574.5 (22%)     max: 10090 Points
11581 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1852     avg: 2147     median: 2114 (2%)     max: 2611 ms
min: 1963     avg: 2154     median: 2154 (3%)     max: 2345 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 855 +
384.2 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 17011     avg: 23749     median: 24044 (22%)     max: 33918 Points
min: 19885     avg: 21727     median: 21726.5 (20%)     max: 23568 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 90     avg: 105.2     median: 106.5 (22%)     max: 129 Points
min: 97     avg: 108     median: 108 (23%)     max: 119 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 239512     avg: 255436     median: 255924 (87%)     max: 268271 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 9188     avg: 13484     median: 13816 (42%)     max: 19329 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 53266     avg: 73247     median: 74726 (92%)     max: 79058 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 67537     avg: 152512     median: 156467 (49%)     max: 191221 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 85969     avg: 115207     median: 118475 (73%)     max: 127208 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 217967     avg: 354450     median: 368232 (65%)     max: 398720 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 51228     avg: 63930     median: 64229 (54%)     max: 72343 Points
min: 70955     avg: 85363     median: 85363 (71%)     max: 99771 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 52596     avg: 61638     median: 59373 (48%)     max: 75544 Points
min: 62954     avg: 81672     median: 81672 (66%)     max: 100390 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 158097     avg: 167704     median: 167146 (31%)     max: 175532 Points
min: 110095     avg: 135414     median: 135414 (25%)     max: 160733 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 114777     avg: 135173     median: 139365 (50%)     max: 140166 Points
min: 136219     avg: 143683     median: 143682 (52%)     max: 151146 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 376698     avg: 428445     median: 432658 (42%)     max: 451559 Points
min: 409039     avg: 446132     median: 446132 (43%)     max: 483224 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 197214     avg: 236383     median: 246456 (32%)     max: 265478 Points
261357 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 855 +
50.5 MB/s (37%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 855 +
304 MB/s (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 855 +
32.9 MB/s (40%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 855 +
1246 MB/s (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 855 +
27144 Points (43%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 855 +
8421 Points (39%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 5121     avg: 6872     median: 6326.5 (33%)     max: 12391 Points
min: 5756     avg: 7469     median: 7469 (39%)     max: 9182 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 5578     avg: 11793     median: 11067 (24%)     max: 18491 Points
min: 8636     avg: 9479     median: 9479 (62%)     max: 10322 Points
min: 10918     avg: 12433     median: 12432.5 (62%)     max: 13947 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 990 → 121% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 09:38:13

#0 checking url part for id 11011 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11510 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:37:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.085s ... 0.086s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.086s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11011 +0.017s ... 0.103s

#7 got single benchmarks 11011 +0.071s ... 0.173s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11510 +0.015s ... 0.188s

#9 got single benchmarks 11510 +0.015s ... 0.203s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.203s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.112s ... 0.315s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.32s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.121s ... 0.441s

#14 return log +0.031s ... 0.472s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)