Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Mediatek Helio P60T

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Mediatek Helio P60T

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio P60T

The Mediatek Helio P60T is an upper mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in early 2018. It is manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET (12FFC) process and is equipped with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE). The cores can reach a frequency of up to 2 GHz. The processor also integrates a ARM Mali-G72MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit. Furthermore, the integrated radio Wifi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.2, and FM radio. The difference to the Helio P60 should be the missing LTE functionality.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 662Mediatek Helio P60T
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonMediatek Mediatek
CodenameKryo 260Cortex-A73 / A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A73 / A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Mediatek Helio P70 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek Helio P60T « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek Helio P60 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek MT8788 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology11 nm12 nm
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP4x ARM Cortex-A73, 4x ARM Cortex-A53,
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G72 MP3 (800 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comi.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1588     avg: 2240     median: 2272 (27%)     max: 2534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 2146     avg: 2330     median: 2384 (27%)     max: 2502 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (9%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
min: 254     avg: 258.5     median: 258.5 (11%)     max: 263 Points
min: 926     avg: 1092     median: 1091.5 (2%)     max: 1257 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
4938 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
3809 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
716 ms (8%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
min: 9656     avg: 10524     median: 10523.5 (9%)     max: 11391 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
48 Points (14%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
min: 59     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (14%)     max: 80 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 26857     avg: 35819     median: 37388 (31%)     max: 38718 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 32579     avg: 37486     median: 34946 (28%)     max: 46499 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 25724     avg: 33052     median: 33402 (6%)     max: 43315 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 68508     avg: 70945     median: 71065 (26%)     max: 72576 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
16222 Points (2%)
6791 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
22.3 MB/s (27%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
352 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
5266 Points (24%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 5866     avg: 6258     median: 6139 (40%)     max: 7184 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7247     avg: 7986     median: 8000.5 (40%)     max: 8714 Points
8851 Points (44%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
328 Points (13%)
255 Points (10%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
41 Points (23%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P60T → 88% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 01:42:08

#0 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12252 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.017s ... 0.036s

#7 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.041s ... 0.077s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12252 +0.004s ... 0.081s

#9 got single benchmarks 12252 +0.008s ... 0.089s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.158s ... 0.247s

#12 return log +0.058s ... 0.305s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)