Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen Z2 vs AMD Ryzen 7 250

AMD Ryzen Z2

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen Z2

The AMD Ryzen Z2 is a fast gaming handheld processor from the Hawk Point series with 8 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 16 threads simultaneously. The CPU uses the Zen 4 architecture and clocks from 3.3 GHz (base clock) up to 5.1 GHz (single-core boost). The CPU offers 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache. Technically the Z2 is identical to the Ryzen 7 7840U and Ryzen 7 8840U but without Ryzen AI Engine.

Due to the lower TDP, the performance should be slightly below the Ryzen 7 7840HS should be lower. The fastest old U processor, the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U should be clearly outperformed.

The chip integrates a relatively modern RDNA 3-based graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs including AV1 video engine. Hawk Point offers 2x USB 4 (40 Gbps), 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support).

The Hawk Point series is a single chip (unlike the Dragon Range 7045HX series) and is manufactured at TSMC using the modern 4nm FinFET process. The TDP is specified by AMD at 15 watts and can be configured from 15 to 30 watts by the manufacturer.

AMD Ryzen 7 250

► remove from comparison AMD R7 250

The AMD Ryzen 7 250 is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the now years-old Hawk Point family that was announced at CES 2025. This isn't an entirely new APU; instead, the R7 250 is a rebadged R7 8840U. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The Radeon 780M iGPU is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 7 250 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interface).

Performance

Since the R7 250 is an 8840U / 7840U in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be about as fast as the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V in multi-thread workloads. Therefore, the CPU performance is good enough even for demanding tasks, as of 2025.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The R7 250 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen Z2AMD Ryzen 7 250
CodenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 230 compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230 compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 250 « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 230 compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230 compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
NPU / AI16 TOPS INT8
Chip AI38 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 250
38.8 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 99.6     avg: 101.8     median: 101.8 (51%)     max: 104 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 764     avg: 805     median: 805 (15%)     max: 846 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 12275     avg: 14235     median: 14255.5 (13%)     max: 16154 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 1649     avg: 1698     median: 1703.5 (69%)     max: 1737 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 655     avg: 674     median: 672.5 (73%)     max: 694 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 4901     avg: 5588     median: 5566 (14%)     max: 6320 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 2002     avg: 2263     median: 2253 (14%)     max: 2544 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 263     avg: 269.8     median: 268.5 (74%)     max: 279 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 250 +
29.8 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 250 +
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 R7 250 +
7457 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 R7 250 +
42932 Points (31%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 R7 250 +
6595 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 57169     avg: 59145     median: 57968 (33%)     max: 63475 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 6163     avg: 6274     median: 6224 (73%)     max: 6485 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 R7 250 +
143.1 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 R7 250 +
268.8 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 15     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (28%)     max: 18.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 R7 250 +
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 R7 250 +
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 R7 250 +
11.1 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 328     avg: 373.5     median: 378.5 (5%)     max: 409 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 204     avg: 226.8     median: 227 (2%)     max: 249 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 0.4471     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.502 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R7 250 +
15033 Points (25%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 R7 250 +
7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 R7 250 +
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 R7 250 +
652 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 R7 250 +
74623 Points (57%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 17185     avg: 18045     median: 18295 (45%)     max: 18654 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 R7 250 +
85107 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 15045     avg: 15632     median: 15632 (40%)     max: 16219 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 21987     avg: 22740     median: 22658.5 (40%)     max: 23655 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 8645     avg: 8907     median: 8862 (37%)     max: 9257 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1699 Points (39%)
min: 2418     avg: 2532     median: 2542.5 (59%)     max: 2623 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
7863 Points (27%)
min: 9641     avg: 10232     median: 10039.5 (34%)     max: 11206 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 1779     avg: 1871     median: 1886 (63%)     max: 1934 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 9215     avg: 9686     median: 9589 (17%)     max: 10350 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
7772 Points (86%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 250 +
40469 Points (53%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 534     avg: 556     median: 549 (1%)     max: 591 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 224     avg: 231.3     median: 232 (58%)     max: 238 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 271     avg: 277.7     median: 281 (47%)     max: 281 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 1412     avg: 1574     median: 1568.5 (55%)     max: 1746 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 39.9     avg: 56.7     median: 55.4 (10%)     max: 76 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 250 +
62.1 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 4.06     avg: 9.5     median: 7.7 (5%)     max: 18.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 R7 250 +
min: 4.93     avg: 10.2     median: 7.3 (5%)     max: 21.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 R7 250 +
37.1 Points per Watt (28%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen Z2 → 100% n=2

AMD Ryzen 7 250 → 139% n=2

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 22. 19:24:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18737 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19148 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1774203874s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Mar 2026 12:56:54 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18737 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 18737 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19148 +0.002s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 19148 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.024s

#13 return log +0.124s ... 0.147s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)