Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

NVIDIA RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop

► remove from comparison NVIDIA RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop

The Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, not to be confused with the A1000, P1000 or T1000, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,560 CUDA cores and 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4050 (Laptop) in disguise; consequently, both are powered by the AD107 chip and are fast enough to handle most games at 1080p with quality set to High. The product was launched in February 2024; it leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and the Ada Lovelace architecture. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 1000 Ada features 20 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 80 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,560 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 20%, and you get the RTX 2000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 1000 comes with just 6 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 96-bit wide, delivering a not-so-impressive bandwidth of ~192 GB/s.

The RTX 1000 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by an RTX 1000 Ada as of late February, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4050 Laptop. Based on that, we expect a run-of-the-mill RTX 2000 Ada to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 54 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 27,000 points
  • around 50 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • upwards of 30 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 12.1 TFLOPS" of performance, a downgrade compared to 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 1000 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is exactly the case with the RTX 1000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 1000 Ada can easily be half as fast as the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 1000 is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

The Nvidia Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the consumer GTX 1650, the Quadro T1000 features less CUDA cores / shaders (768 versus 896). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. Compared to the normal Quadro T1000, the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of two variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (35 and 40 W).

ModelShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro T1000 Mobile7685013951455
Quadro T1000 Max-Q7684012301455
Quadro T1000 Max-Q768357951455
Quadro T2000 Mobile10246015751785
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile8965013951560

The Quadro T1000 is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU116 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the T1000 integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. Due to the same boost clock as the mobile T1000, the Max-Q variants can perform similar with sufficient cooling.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Thanks to the low power consumption, the Max-Q T2000 GPU can be used in thin and light laptops. The used TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

NVIDIA RTX 1000 Ada Generation LaptopNVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro Turing Series
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop compare 2048 @ 1.49 - 2.03 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 compare 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameGN21-X2N19P-Q1
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTuring
Pipelines2560 - unified768 - unified
TMUs80
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores20
Tensor / AI Cores80
AI GPU193 TOPS INT8
CacheL2: 12 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)35 - 40 Watt
technology5 nm12 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement27.02.2024 27.05.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
Core Speed795 / 1230 - 1455 (Boost) MHz

Benchmarks

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 31. 00:46:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12424 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9888 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761867969s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:19:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.016s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12424 +0.017s ... 0.033s

#9 got single benchmarks 12424 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9888 +0s ... 0.037s

#11 got single benchmarks 9888 +0.002s ... 0.039s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.039s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.039s

#15 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.04s

#16 return log +0.002s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)