Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

► remove from comparison AMD R9 9955HX3D

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is a high-end notebook processor of the Fire Range series with 16 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. The CPU uses the new Zen 5 architecture for all 16 cores and clocks them at 2.5 to 5.4 GHz (single-core boost). As a special feature, the HX3D has an additional 64M 3D V-Cache on a CCD. This means that the CPU offers combined 128 MB L3 cache and 16 MB L2 cache. The chip was presented at CES in early 2025 and is intended for fast and expensive gaming notebooks.

AMD claims that the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is the fastest mobile gaming CPU. Based on the experience with its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, this is quite realistic. The 3D V-Cache in particular can accelerate demanding 3D games. However, the 16 fast Zen 5 cores should also provide enough power for all possible demanding applications.

The 9955HX3D is intended for large and heavy gaming notebooks and can therefore draw quite an amount of power (configurable from 55- to 75 watts TDP, default 55 watts). The SoC consists out of three dies on a package where the processor dies are manufactured in the modern 4nm 4nm FinFET process at TSMC (I/O die in 6nm) and should therefore still have a good energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes with 16 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.1 GHz, the 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support and a whole lot of L3 cache.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max+ chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

From leaks, we know that the Ryzen delivers around 20,700 Geekbench 6.3 Multi points, meaning it trades blow with very powerful desktop CPUs like the Ryzen 9 9900X.

Graphics

The Radeon 8060S is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer, as of Jan 2025. It features 40 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2560 unified shaders) that could see it outcompeting lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the GeForce RTX 4050. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max+ 395 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3DAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
CodenameFire Range-HX (Zen 5)Strix Halo
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX compare2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX compare3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 compare3.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Clock2500 - 5400 MHz3000 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache1.3 MB
L2 Cache16 MB16 MB
L3 Cache128 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 5
16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
SocketFP11
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 9955HX3D
49.5 pt (82%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI Max+ 395
46.4 pt (77%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 129.4     avg: 129.7     median: 129.7 (73%)     max: 130 Points
min: 114     avg: 115.4     median: 115.4 (65%)     max: 116.8 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2072     avg: 2117     median: 2120 (39%)     max: 2160 Points
min: 1648     avg: 1769     median: 1769 (33%)     max: 1890 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 38864     avg: 39065     median: 39065 (36%)     max: 39266 Points
min: 29063     avg: 33243     median: 33243 (31%)     max: 37423 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2165     avg: 2172     median: 2172 (91%)     max: 2179 Points
min: 2034     avg: 2038     median: 2038 (86%)     max: 2042 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 847     avg: 849     median: 849 (92%)     max: 851 Points
min: 791     avg: 796     median: 795.5 (87%)     max: 800 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 15146     avg: 15162     median: 15161.5 (37%)     max: 15177 Points
min: 11357     avg: 12999     median: 12999 (32%)     max: 14641 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 6041     avg: 6043     median: 6042.5 (38%)     max: 6044 Points
min: 4830     avg: 5277     median: 5276.5 (33%)     max: 5723 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 321     avg: 327     median: 327 (91%)     max: 333 Points
min: 316     avg: 316.5     median: 316.5 (88%)     max: 317 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 69.12     avg: 69.9     median: 69.9 (90%)     max: 70.66 Points
min: 55.9     avg: 60.1     median: 60.1 (78%)     max: 64.21 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
4 Points (95%)
min: 3.74     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (89%)     max: 3.75 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9264     avg: 9269     median: 9269 (56%)     max: 9274 Points
min: 8693     avg: 8711     median: 8710.5 (53%)     max: 8728 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 77481     avg: 79410     median: 79410 (58%)     max: 81339 Points
min: 63189     avg: 65332     median: 65332 (47%)     max: 67475 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144628 Points (92%)
114175 Points (73%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17085 Points (21%)
16196 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 135     avg: 172.7     median: 172.7 (2%)     max: 210.4 s
min: 32.871     avg: 190     median: 190 (2%)     max: 347.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.4     avg: 5     median: 5 (1%)     max: 5.5 s
min: 2.555     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (1%)     max: 7.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 11412     avg: 29422     median: 29421.5 (47%)     max: 47431 Points
min: 8365     avg: 23388     median: 23387.5 (37%)     max: 38410 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 145803     avg: 146945     median: 146944 (84%)     max: 148086 MIPS
min: 121368     avg: 123210     median: 123210 (71%)     max: 125052 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7151     avg: 7226     median: 7225.5 (85%)     max: 7300 MIPS
min: 6478     avg: 6509     median: 6509 (77%)     max: 6540 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
257.1 fps (86%)
189.4 fps (63%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
363.6 fps (84%)
327.5 fps (76%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 42.3     avg: 42.5     median: 42.5 (75%)     max: 42.7 fps
min: 33.7     avg: 35     median: 35 (61%)     max: 36.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 3.2     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (97%)     max: 3.4 GB/s
min: 1.7     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (66%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 4.5     avg: 5     median: 5 (85%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
min: 2.7     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (61%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 27.5     avg: 29.1     median: 29.1 (76%)     max: 30.6 GB/s
min: 16.7     avg: 20.1     median: 20.1 (52%)     max: 23.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
123 Seconds (2%)
min: 132     avg: 147.5     median: 147.5 (2%)     max: 163 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
80 Seconds (1%)
min: 86     avg: 96.5     median: 96.5 (1%)     max: 107 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3552     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3677 sec
min: 0.3985     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4094 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16635     avg: 17703     median: 17702.5 (38%)     max: 18770 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
min: 8.2     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 8.31 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
min: 17.6     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.621 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 373     avg: 373.3     median: 373.3 (2%)     max: 373.6 s
407.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 88295     avg: 90700     median: 90700 (70%)     max: 93105 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 33212     avg: 34146     median: 34146 (84%)     max: 35080 Points
min: 22299     avg: 24649     median: 24648.5 (61%)     max: 26998 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84504 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
83969 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
82293 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
23592 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 37856     avg: 41184     median: 42689 (76%)     max: 43007 Points
min: 32060     avg: 35068     median: 35067.5 (63%)     max: 38075 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12913     avg: 13307     median: 13082 (55%)     max: 13926 Points
min: 9860     avg: 10573     median: 10572.5 (45%)     max: 11285 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 3146     avg: 3188     median: 3184.5 (80%)     max: 3237 Points
min: 2791     avg: 2885     median: 2884.5 (72%)     max: 2978 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 19788     avg: 20200     median: 20231 (79%)     max: 20551 Points
min: 17599     avg: 19434     median: 19434 (75%)     max: 21269 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2991 Points (95%)
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
19386 Points (80%)
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2381     avg: 2391     median: 2391 (93%)     max: 2401 Points
min: 2184     avg: 2230     median: 2229.5 (87%)     max: 2275 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23468     avg: 23569     median: 23568.5 (42%)     max: 23669 Points
min: 17552     avg: 19788     median: 19787.5 (35%)     max: 22023 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2270 Points (10%)
1991 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
23588 Points (74%)
17929 Points (57%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9492 Points (95%)
8054 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
97490 Points (97%)
66840 Points (67%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
397 ms (0%)
min: 425     avg: 426     median: 426 (0%)     max: 427 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
132328 Points (97%)
123023 Points (90%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 320     avg: 326.5     median: 326.5 (90%)     max: 333 Points
min: 253     avg: 285     median: 285 (78%)     max: 317 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 342     avg: 354     median: 354 (64%)     max: 366 Points
min: 317     avg: 337.5     median: 337.5 (61%)     max: 358 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2199     avg: 2243     median: 2264 (85%)     max: 2265 Points
min: 2069     avg: 2172     median: 2171.5 (81%)     max: 2274 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 216     avg: 222     median: 222 (38%)     max: 228 Watt
min: 111.2     avg: 144.2     median: 144.2 (25%)     max: 177.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
221 Watt (40%)
min: 133.2     avg: 163     median: 163 (30%)     max: 192.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 12.3     avg: 35.1     median: 35.1 (23%)     max: 57.8 Watt
min: 11.2     avg: 11.4     median: 11.4 (8%)     max: 11.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 14.2     avg: 30.1     median: 30.1 (33%)     max: 45.9 Watt
13.8 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
27.3 Points per Watt (20%)
min: 29.7     avg: 33     median: 33 (25%)     max: 36.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D → 100% n=49

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 → 87% n=49

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 06:41:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18729 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18628 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755405703s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18729 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 18729 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18628 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 18628 +0.007s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.084s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)